Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 7;18(9):4983.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094983.

Water-Food Nexus Assessment in Agriculture: A Systematic Review

Evelyn Corona-López  1 , Alma D Román-Gutiérrez  1 , Elena M Otazo-Sánchez  1 , Fabiola A Guzmán-Ortiz  2 , Otilio A Acevedo-Sandoval  1
Affiliations

Water-Food Nexus Assessment in Agriculture: A Systematic Review

Evelyn Corona-López et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The Water-Food Nexus (WF) has been proposed to reach equitable, balanced, and sustainable access to water and food resources in the face of the growing population demand. Therefore, developing models to assess them has become more relevant. This work systematically reviews the literature on the tools used to evaluate water and food resources between 2002 and 2020. Furthermore, it reports a critical analysis of the software used to assess the WF Nexus quantitatively. The models analyzed were Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact (CAPRI), Global Food and Water System (GFWS), Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), Water Evaluation And Planning system (WEAP), and Soil Water Atmosphere Plant (SWAP). We deduced that the following are necessary in evaluating the WF Nexus: (1) the capacity to generate future scenarios, (2) a global application, and (3) the application in case studies. The present paper is the first review to provide an overview of the software applied to evaluate WF Nexus, including the advantages and disadvantages of the tools found. They can help build sustainability criteria when designing policies that reduce water and food security risks and promote efficient water and food use.

Keywords: CAPRI; GFWS; LCA; SWAT; WEAP; WF Nexus; crops.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interaction between the Water–Food Nexus and United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Published documents about Water–Energy–Food (WEF), Water–Energy (WE), Water–Food (WF), and others. SCOPUS analysis in 2002–2020.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PRISMA according to [35] methodology criteria of the literature 2002–2020.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maja M.M., Ayano S.F. The Impact of Population Growth on Natural Resources and Farmers’ Capacity to Adapt to Climate Change in Low-Income Countries. Earth Syst. Environ. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s41748-021-00209-6. - DOI
    1. Rasul G. Managing the food, water, and energy nexus for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in South Asia. Environ. Dev. 2016;18:14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.12.001. - DOI
    1. Sapkota A.R. Water reuse, food production and public health: Adopting transdisciplinary, systems-based approaches to achieve water and food security in a changing climate. Environ. Res. 2019;171:576–580. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferroukhi R., Nagpal D., López P.Á., Hodges T., Mohtar R., Daher B., Mohtar S., Keulertz M. Renewable Energy in the Water, Energy & Food Nexus. International Renewable Energy Agency; Masdar City, Abu Dhabi: 2015. pp. 24–35.
    1. Mannan M., Al-Ansari T., Mackey H.R., Al-Ghamdi S.G. Quantifying the energy, water and food nexus: A review of the latest developments based on life-cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;193:300–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.050. - DOI

Publication types