Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 7;13(5):674.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050674.

Combination Therapy, a Promising Approach to Enhance the Efficacy of Radionuclide and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate and Breast Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Combination Therapy, a Promising Approach to Enhance the Efficacy of Radionuclide and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate and Breast Cancer

Tyrillshall S T Damiana et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

In recent years, radionuclide therapy (RT) and targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) have gained great interest in cancer treatment. This is due to promising results obtained in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, a complete response is achieved in only a small percentage of patients that receive RT or TRT. As a consequence, there have been several strategies to improve RT and TRT outcomes including the combination of these treatments with other well-established anti-cancer therapies, for example, chemotherapy. Combinations of RT and TRT with other therapies with distinct mechanisms of action represent a promising strategy. As for prostate cancer and breast cancer, the two most prevalent cancer types worldwide, several combination-based therapies have been evaluated. In this review, we will provide an overview of the RT and TRT agents currently used or being investigated in combination with hormone therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer.

Keywords: breast cancer; combination therapy; peptide receptor radionuclide therapy; prostate cancer; radionuclide therapy; targeted radionuclide therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cell-cycle and respective sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. G0; Gap 0 phase, G1: Gap 1 phase, G2: Gap 2 phase, S: Synthesis phase, M: Mitosis phase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kassis A.I., Adelstein S.J. Radiobiologic principles in radionuclide therapy. J. Nucl. Med. 2005;46:4S–12S. - PubMed
    1. Yeong C.H., Cheng M.H., Ng K.H. Therapeutic radionuclides in nuclear medicine: Current and future prospects. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2014;15:845–863. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400131. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ersahin D., Doddamane I., Cheng D. Targeted radionuclide therapy. Cancers. 2011;3:3838–3855. doi: 10.3390/cancers3043838. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dash A., Chakraborty S., Pillai M.R., Knapp F.F., Jr. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: An overview. CancerBiother. Radiopharm. 2015;30:47–71. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2014.1741. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nayak T.K., Brechbiel M.W. Radioimmunoimaging with longer-lived positron-emitting radionuclides: Potentials and challenges. Bioconjug. Chem. 2009;20:825–841. doi: 10.1021/bc800299f. - DOI - PMC - PubMed