Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 22;18(11):5552.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115552.

Health and Risk Behaviors of Bystanders: An Integrative Theoretical Model of Bystanders' Reactions to Mistreatment

Affiliations

Health and Risk Behaviors of Bystanders: An Integrative Theoretical Model of Bystanders' Reactions to Mistreatment

Yariv Itzkovich et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This article constructs a comprehensive theoretical model that outlines bystanders' emotional and behavioral responses to the mistreatment of adolescent peers. The model captures bystanders' risk and health risk behaviors, which have been overlooked in the context of their reactions; when addressed at all in connection with bystanders of bullying among adolescents, they have been treated separately. Here, we present bystanders' emotional and cognitive reactions and their impact on bystanders' responses including a set of responses that demonstrate risk and health risk behaviors that are directed to the bystander as a victim by proxy. The theoretical framework is the conservation of resources theory, which posits that personal resources (i.e., potency and moral disengagement) and social resources impact the process that leads to bystanders' reactions. Previous models have overlooked the integrative viewpoint of bystanders, and comprehensive models that explain bystanders' behavioral and emotional responses have received little attention especially with regards to adolescents. Two recent models overlooked core features embedded in the current model, including the risk and health risk behaviors that it integrates. The proposed model presents a novel and more comprehensive view of bystanders' reactions and the process underlying these reactions. It integrates existing knowledge embedded in other existing models. At the same time, this perspective indicates the centricity of potency as a key resource that dictates the emotional response and behaviors of bystanders. This potentially allows for new applications in the mitigation of adverse impacts that follow the witnessing of mistreatment. The article discusses these applications, which are based on previous findings, their implications for practice, and directions for future empirical research necessary to validate the model.

Keywords: adolescents’ risk and health risk behaviors; bystanders’ responses; conservation of resources theory; mistreatment; moral disengagement; potency; theoretical model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process and dynamics of bystanders’ reactions in the framework of COR: the proposed model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pozzoli T., Gini G. Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2010;38:815–827. doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pozzoli T., Gini G. Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. J. Early Adolesc. 2012;33:315–340. doi: 10.1177/0272431612440172. - DOI
    1. Cowie H. Understanding the role of bystanders and peer support in school bullying. Int. J. Emot. Educ. 2014;6:26–32.
    1. Hutchinson M. Exploring the impact of bullying on young bystanders. Educ. Psychol. Pract. 2012;28:425–442. doi: 10.1080/02667363.2012.727785. - DOI
    1. Gaete J., Tornero B., Valenzuela D., Rojas-Barahona C.A., Salmivalli C., Valenzuela E., Araya R. Substance use among adolescents involved in bullying: A cross-sectional multilevel study. Front. Psychol. 2017;8:1056:1–1056:14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed