Human-Wildlife Conflicts in the Southern Yungas: What Role do Raptors Play for Local Settlers?
- PMID: 34067506
- PMCID: PMC8156693
- DOI: 10.3390/ani11051428
Human-Wildlife Conflicts in the Southern Yungas: What Role do Raptors Play for Local Settlers?
Abstract
Wildlife persecution due to human-wildlife conflict has become a serious concern for biodiversity conservation, especially for many endangered species. In this context, conservation approaches need to consider the socio-ecological dimensions of each particular situation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the existence, extent and social characteristics of Human-Raptor Conflicts (HRC) in the Southern Yungas region in northwestern Argentina. We conducted 115 semi-structured interviews in 21 sites and analyzed attitudes and associations between sociodemographic variables and the existence of HRC. Forty percent of interviewees showed negative attitudes towards raptors, mainly with those species considered livestock predators rather than poultry predators. A total of 11 species were regarded as conflictive because of predation on domestic animals, of which Andean condors showed the highest conflict. The only socio-demographic factor affecting conflicts was livestock and poultry rearing, independently of age, gender and occupation of interviewees. The fact that only 8.7% of interviewees reported taking direct actions towards conflictive species indicates a relatively peaceful coexistence of people with raptors. Nevertheless, negative attitudes towards Andean condor together with their extreme susceptibility to any increase in non-natural mortality indicate the need of an integral conservation approach to tackle future threats for this species' conservation in the area.
Keywords: Vultur gryphus; andean condor; attitudes; birds of prey; human-wildlife conflict; human-wildlife interactions; perceptions; socio-ecological system.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Distefano E. Human-Wildlife Conflict Worldwide: Collection of Case Studies, Analysis of Management Strategies and Good Practices. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development Initiative (SARDI); Rome, Italy: 2005.
-
- Dickman A.J. Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Anim. Conserv. 2010;13:458–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x. - DOI
-
- Redpath S.M., Bhatia S., Young J. Tilting at wildlife: Reconsidering human-wildlife conflict. Oryx. 2014;49:222–225. doi: 10.1017/S0030605314000799. - DOI
-
- Thirgood S., Woodroffe R., Rabinowitz A. The impact of human–wildlife conflict on human lives and livelihoods. In: Woodroffe R., Thirgood S., Rabinowitz A., editors. People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2005. pp. 13–26.
-
- Madden F. Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: Global perspectives on local efforts to address Human–Wildlife conflict. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2004;9:247–257. doi: 10.1080/10871200490505675. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
