Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 17;11(5):654.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050654.

Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review

Alessandra Sansavini et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is frequent in childhood and may have long-term sequelae. By employing an evidence-based approach, this scoping review aims at identifying (a) early predictors of DLD; (b) the optimal age range for the use of screening and diagnostic tools; (c) effective diagnostic tools in preschool children.

Methods: We considered systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and primary observational studies with control groups on predictive, sensitivity and specificity values of screening and diagnostic tools and psycholinguistic measures for the assessment of DLD in preschool children. We identified 37 studies, consisting of 10 systematic reviews and 27 primary studies.

Results: Delay in gesture production, receptive and/or expressive vocabulary, syntactic comprehension, or word combination up to 30 months emerged as early predictors of DLD, a family history of DLD appeared to be a major risk factor, and low socioeconomic status and environmental input were reported as risk factors with lower predictive power. Optimal time for screening is suggested between age 2 and 3, for diagnosis around age 4. Because of the high variability of sensitivity and specificity values, joint use of standardized and psycholinguistic measures is suggested to increase diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions: Monitoring risk situations and employing caregivers' reports, clinical assessment and multiple linguistic measures are fundamental for an early identification of DLD and timely interventions.

Keywords: age of assessment; developmental language disorder; diagnostic tools; early predictors; evidence-based medicine; language delay; late talkers; screening tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the included studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kuhl P. Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron. 2010;67:713–727. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.038. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perani D., Saccuman M.C., Scifo P., Anwander A., Spada D., Baldoli C., Poloniato A., Lohmann G., Friederici A.D. Neural language networks at birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;20:16056–16061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102991108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riva V., Cantiani C., Dionne G., Marini A., Mascheretti S., Molteni M., Marino C. Working memory mediates the effects of gestational age at birth on expressive language development in children. Neuropsychology. 2017;31:475–485. doi: 10.1037/neu0000376. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caselli M.C., Rinaldi P., Stefanini S., Volterra V. Early action and gesture ‘‘vocabulary’’ and its relation with word comprehension and production. Child Dev. 2012;83:526–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01727.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fenson L., Dale P.S., Reznick J.S., Bates E., Thal D., Pethick S. Variability in early communicative development. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 1994;59:1–173. doi: 10.2307/1166093. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources