Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 13;10(5):1081.
doi: 10.3390/foods10051081.

Selected Instrumental Techniques Applied in Food and Feed: Quality, Safety and Adulteration Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Selected Instrumental Techniques Applied in Food and Feed: Quality, Safety and Adulteration Analysis

Graciela Artavia et al. Foods. .

Abstract

This review presents an overall glance at selected instrumental analytical techniques and methods used in food analysis, focusing on their primary food science research applications. The methods described represent approaches that have already been developed or are currently being implemented in our laboratories. Some techniques are widespread and well known and hence we will focus only in very specific examples, whilst the relatively less common techniques applied in food science are covered in a wider fashion. We made a particular emphasis on the works published on this topic in the last five years. When appropriate, we referred the reader to specialized reports highlighting each technique's principle and focused on said technologies' applications in the food analysis field. Each example forwarded will consider the advantages and limitations of the application. Certain study cases will typify that several of the techniques mentioned are used simultaneously to resolve an issue, support novel data, or gather further information from the food sample.

Keywords: adulteration; authenticity; food and feed research; food chemistry; instrumental food analysis; nutritional quality; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representation of selected analytical methods and targets to exemplify applications in quality, safety, and authenticity of foods. Each technique complements each other, from each a different amount and nature of information is gathered. Additionally, each technique can benefit from other instrument’s capabilities (e.g., Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) benefits from Liquid Chromatography (LC) or Gas Chromatography (GC) separation power).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cifuentes A. Food Analysis: Present, Future, and Foodomics. ISRN Anal. Chem. 2012;2012 doi: 10.5402/2012/801607. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maringer M., van’t Veer P., Klepacz N., Verain M.C.D., Normann A., Ekman S., Timotijevic L., Raats M.M., Geelen A. User-documented food consumption data from publicly available apps: An analysis of opportunities and challenges for nutrition research. Nutr. J. 2018;17:59. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0366-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Llanaj E., Ádány R., Lachat C., D’Haese M. Examining food intake and eating out of home patterns among university students. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuo S.-H., Lin H.-C. Effects of food environments and eating environments on consumers’ food consumption volume. J. Food Qual. 2019;2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/7237602. - DOI
    1. Wahl D.R., Villinger K., König L.M., Ziesemer K., Schupp H.T., Renner B. Healthy food choices are happy food choices: Evidence from a real life sample using smartphone based assessment. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:17069. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17262-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources