Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 13;18(10):5181.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105181.

Indicators of Land, Water, Energy and Food (LWEF) Nexus Resource Drivers: A Perspective on Environmental Degradation in the Gidabo Watershed, Southern Ethiopia

Affiliations

Indicators of Land, Water, Energy and Food (LWEF) Nexus Resource Drivers: A Perspective on Environmental Degradation in the Gidabo Watershed, Southern Ethiopia

Zinabu Wolde et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

In Ethiopia, land, water, energy and food (LWEF) nexus resources are under pressure due to population growth, urbanization and unplanned consumption. The effect of this pressure has been a widely discussed topic in nexus resource literature. The evidence shows the predominantly negative impact of this; however, the impact of these factors is less explored from a local scale. As a result, securing nexus resources is becoming a serious challenge for the country. This necessitates the identification of the driving factors for the sustainable utilization of scarce LWEF nexus resources. Our study provides a systemic look at the driving factor indicators that induce nexus resource degradation. We use the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to develop the indicators' weights, and use a Path Analysis Model (PAM) to quantitatively estimate the effect of the driving factor indicators on the LWEF nexus resources. The results indicate that social (48%), economic (19%), and policy and institutional changes (14%) are the major nexus resource driving factor indicators. The path analysis results indicate that among the social driving factor indicators, population growth and consumption patterns have a significant direct effect on the LWEF nexus, with path coefficients of 0.15 and 0.089, respectively. Similarly, the potential of LWEF nexus resources is also influenced by the institutional and policy change drivers, such as outdated legislation and poor institutional structure, with path coefficients of 0.46 and 0.39, respectively. This implies that population growth and consumption patterns are the leading social drivers, while outdated legislation and poor institutional structures are the institutional and policies change drivers which have a potential impact on LWEF nexus resource degradation. Similarly, other driving factors such as environmental, economic and technological factors also affect nexus resources to varying degrees. The findings of our study show the benefits of managing the identified driving factors for the protection of LWEF nexus resources, which have close links with human health and the environment. In order to alleviate the adverse effects of driving factors, all stakeholders need to show permanent individual and collective commitment. Furthermore, we underline the necessity of applying LWEF nexus approaches to the management of these drivers, and to optimize the environmental and social outcomes.

Keywords: degradation; driving factor; indicators; land-water-energy-food nexus; path coefficient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of the case study area.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The weight of the five main nexus resource driving factor indicators.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Main LWEF nexus resource driving factor indicators.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The social driving factor indicators of LWEF nexus resources.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Population projection in the study area (data source: Central Rift Valley document).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Economic driver indicators of LWEF nexus resources.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Institution and policy change drivers of LWEF nexus resources.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The final comprehensive path model which tested the ways in which the main driving factor indicators affect the LWEF nexus. The indices of model fit demonstrated its excellent goodness-of-fit (X(6)2 = 7.24, p = 0.31, TLI = 0.99; NFI = 0.92; RMSEA = 0.03), and all of the paths in the model are significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The impact of frost due to climatic variability in the highland part of the Gidabo watershed.
Figure 10
Figure 10
LWEF nexus resource degradation impacts on ecological characteristics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Saidi M., Elagib N.A. Towards understanding the integrative approach of the water, energy and food nexus. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017;574:1131–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ringler C., Bhaduri A., Lawford R. The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF): Potential for improved resource use efficiency? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013;5:617–624. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.002. - DOI
    1. Imasiku K., Ntagwirumugara E. An impact analysis of population growth on energy-water-food-land nexus for ecological sustainable development in Rwanda. Food Energy Secur. 2020;9:e185. doi: 10.1002/fes3.185. - DOI
    1. Bakhshianlamouki E., Masia S., Karimi P., van der Zaag P., Sušnik J. A system dynamics model to quantify the impacts of restoration measures on the water-energy-food nexus in the Urmia lake Basin, Iran. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020;708:134874. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134874. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abel C., Horion S., Tagesson T., De Keersmaecker W., Seddon A.W., Abdi A.M., Fensholt R. The human-environment nexus and vegetation-rainfall sensitivity in tropical drylands. Nat. Sustain. 2020;4:25–32. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00597-z. - DOI

Publication types