Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 13;12(5):736.
doi: 10.3390/genes12050736.

Statistical Learning Methods Applicable to Genome-Wide Association Studies on Unbalanced Case-Control Disease Data

Affiliations
Review

Statistical Learning Methods Applicable to Genome-Wide Association Studies on Unbalanced Case-Control Disease Data

Xiaotian Dai et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

Despite the fact that imbalance between case and control groups is prevalent in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), it is often overlooked. This imbalance is getting more significant and urgent as the rapid growth of biobanks and electronic health records have enabled the collection of thousands of phenotypes from large cohorts, in particular for diseases with low prevalence. The unbalanced binary traits pose serious challenges to traditional statistical methods in terms of both genomic selection and disease prediction. For example, the well-established linear mixed models (LMM) yield inflated type I error rates in the presence of unbalanced case-control ratios. In this article, we review multiple statistical approaches that have been developed to overcome the inaccuracy caused by the unbalanced case-control ratio, with the advantages and limitations of each approach commented. In addition, we also explore the potential for applying several powerful and popular state-of-the-art machine-learning approaches, which have not been applied to the GWAS field yet. This review paves the way for better analysis and understanding of the unbalanced case-control disease data in GWAS.

Keywords: GWAS; disease; genomic prediction; genomic selection; unbalanced case-control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of GEV-NN structure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sudlow C., Gallacher J., Allen N., Beral V., Burton P., Danesh J., Downey P., Elliott P., Green J., Landray M., et al. UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen H., Wang C., Conomos M.P., Stilp A.M., Li Z., Sofer T., Szpiro A.A., Chen W., Brehm J.M., Celedón J.C., et al. Control for Population Structure and Relatedness for Binary Traits in Genetic Association Studies via Logistic Mixed Models. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016;98:653–666. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.02.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dey R., Schmidt E.M., Abecasis G.R., Lee S. A Fast and Accurate Algorithm to Test for Binary Phenotypes and Its Application to PheWAS. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2017;101:37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.05.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fritsche L.G., Gruber S.B., Wu Z., Schmidt E.M., Zawistowski M., Moser S.E., Blanc V.M., Brummett C.M., Kheterpal S., Abecasis G.R., et al. Association of Polygenic Risk Scores for Multiple Cancers in a Phenome-wide Study: Results from The Michigan Genomics Initiative. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018;102:1048–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.04.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacArthur J., Bowler E., Cerezo M., Gil L., Hall P., Hastings E., Junkins H., McMahon A., Milano A., Morales J., et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog) Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D896–D901. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources