Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 13;11(5):410.
doi: 10.3390/jpm11050410.

Future Perspectives of Proton Therapy in Minimizing the Toxicity of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Future Perspectives of Proton Therapy in Minimizing the Toxicity of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Marika Musielak et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

The toxicity of radiotherapy is a key issue when analyzing the eligibility criteria for patients with breast cancer. In order to obtain better results, proton therapy is proposed because of the more favorable distribution of the dose in the patient's body compared with photon radiotherapy. Scientific groups have conducted extensive research into the improved efficacy and lower toxicity of proton therapy for breast cancer. Unfortunately, there is no complete insight into the potential reasons and prospects for avoiding undesirable results. Cardiotoxicity is considered challenging; however, researchers have not presented any realistic prospects for preventing them. We compared the clinical evidence collected over the last 20 years, providing the rationale for the consideration of proton therapy as an effective solution to reduce cardiotoxicity. We analyzed the parameters of the dose distribution (mean dose, Dmax, V5, and V20) in organs at risk, such as the heart, blood vessels, and lungs, using the following two irradiation techniques: whole breast irradiation and accelerated partial breast irradiation. Moreover, we presented the possible causes of side effects, taking into account biological and technical issues. Finally, we collected potential improvements in higher quality predictions of toxic cardiac effects, like biomarkers, and model-based approaches to give the full background of this complex issue.

Keywords: breast cancer; cardiotoxicity; proton therapy; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristic dose distribution of the proton beam.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brada M., Pijls-Johannesma M., De Ruysscher D. Current Clinical Evidence for Proton Therapy. Cancer J. 2009;15:319–324. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181b6127c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Endo M., Robert R. Wilson (1914–2000): The first scientist to propose particle therapy—Use of particle beam for cancer treatment. Radiol. Phys. Technol. 2018;11:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s12194-017-0428-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson R.R. Radiological Use of Fast Protons. Radiology. 1946;47:487–491. doi: 10.1148/47.5.487. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slater J.D., Rossi C.J., Yonemoto L.T., Bush D.A., Jabola B.R., Levy R.P., Grove R.I., Preston W., Slater J.M. Proton therapy for prostate cancer: The initial Loma Linda University experience. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2004;59:348–352. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Particle Therapy Facilities in Clinical Operation (Last Update: May 2021) [(accessed on 13 May 2021)]; Available online: https://www.ptcog.ch/index.php/facilities-in-operation.

LinkOut - more resources