Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 14;10(5):598.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10050598.

Biocidal Resistance in Clinically Relevant Microbial Species: A Major Public Health Risk

Affiliations
Review

Biocidal Resistance in Clinically Relevant Microbial Species: A Major Public Health Risk

Elaine Meade et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the greatest dangers to public health of the 21st century, threatening the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases globally. Disinfection, the elimination of microbial species via the application of biocidal chemicals, is essential to control infectious diseases and safeguard animal and human health. In an era of antimicrobial resistance and emerging disease, the effective application of biocidal control measures is vital to protect public health. The COVID-19 pandemic is an example of the increasing demand for effective biocidal solutions to reduce and eliminate disease transmission. However, there is increasing recognition into the relationship between biocide use and the proliferation of Antimicrobial Resistance species, particularly multidrug-resistant pathogens. The One Health approach and WHO action plan to combat AMR require active surveillance and monitoring of AMR species; however, biocidal resistance is often overlooked. ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) pathogens and numerous fungal species have demonstrated drug and biocidal resistance where increased patient mortality is a risk. Currently, there is a lack of information on the impact of biocide application on environmental habitats and ecosystems. Undoubtedly, the excessive application of disinfectants and AMR will merge to result in secondary disasters relating to soil infertility, loss of biodiversity and destruction of ecosystems.

Keywords: biocide; environment; health; pathogens; resistance; risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lomazzi M., Moore M., Johnson A., Balasegaram M., Borisch B. Antimicrobial resistance—Moving forward? BMC Public Health. 2019;19 doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7173-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prestinaci F., Pezzotti P., Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: A global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog. Glob. Health. 2015;109:309–318. doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miranda C.D., Godoy F.A., Lee M.R. Current Status of the Use of Antibiotics and the Antimicrobial Resistance in the Chilean Salmon Farms. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1284. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01284. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van T.T.H., Yidana Z., Smooker P.M., Coloe P.J. Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020;20:170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ma F., Xu S., Tang Z., Li Z., Zhang L. Use of antimicrobials in food animals and impact of transmission of antimicrobial resistance on humans. Biosaf. Health. 2021;3:32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2020.09.004. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources