Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 14;11(5):1402.
doi: 10.3390/ani11051402.

Effect of One-Day Delaying CIDR Administration in 5-Day Cosynch Protocol in Dairy Heifers

Affiliations

Effect of One-Day Delaying CIDR Administration in 5-Day Cosynch Protocol in Dairy Heifers

Sükrü Metin Pancarci et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Effect of one-day delaying progesterone administration at the beginning of 5-day Cosynch protocol was investigated in Holstein heifers for the first artificial insemination (AI). Heifers received a synchronized ovulation and timed AI (TAI) with CIDR inserted on day (d) 0 (CIDR-5; n = 206) or d 1 (CIDR-4; n = 192). In both group, GnRH was administered on d 0 followed by a single PGF injection and CIDR removal five days later from GnRH. On d 8, TAI and GnRH administration were concurrently conducted. Heifers detected in estrus up to 24 h prior to TAI were inseminated without GnRH administration. Rates of ovulation, accessory CL formation and new dominant follicle development following initial GnRH injection did not differ between groups. P/AI did not differ between CIDR-4 (44.3%, [85/192]) and CIDR-5 (51.9%, [107/206]) groups, respectively. Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was significantly (p < 0.01) declined as heifers' age (12-13, 14, 15, 16 and17-21 months) proceeded in CIDR-4 group (55.6%, 52.1%, 37.9%, 35.7%, 32.4%) compared to those in CIDR-5 group (60.0%, 50.0%, 53.9%, 51.5%, 46.2%) respectively. In conclusion, there is no benefit for delaying CIDR administration in 5-day Cosynch protocol in dairy heifers. However, higher P/AI in CIDR-5 group in older heifers can be considered for reproductive management.

Keywords: Cosynch; TAI; dairy heifer; follicle development; pregnancy; progesterone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagrammatic representation of experimental design of treatments. CIDR, controlled internal drug release; TAI, timed artificial insemination; PD, Pregnancy diagnosis. Heifers at five locations were assigned randomly to receive a synchronization of ovulation and TAI. Both treatments consisted of a GnRH injection on day 0. CIDR inserted on day (d) 0 (CIDR-5; n = 206) or d 1 (CIDR-4; n = 192) of synchronization program. On d 8, TAI and GnRH administration were concurrently conducted. Heifers detected in estrus up to 24 h prior to TAI were inseminated without GnRH administration (AIE).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Development of original CL, accessory CL and new wave dominant follicle during experimental period.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The distribution of AI at detected estruses (AIE, black bars) and timed artificial insemination (TAI, gray bars) in CIDR-4 and CIDR-5 groups. Rate of AIE was tended (p < 0.09) to be higher in CIDR-5 group than that in CIDR-4 group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Significant (p < 0.01) interaction effect of treatment (CIDR-4 vs. CIDR-5) by age of heifer indicates lower pregnancy per AI in CIDR-4 (gray bars) group as heifers age increased compared to CIDR-5 (black bars) group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Significant (p < 0.05) interaction effect of treatment (CIDR-4 vs. CIDR-5) by presynchronization indicates lower pregnancy per AI in heifers without presynchronization (gray bars) compared to those with presynchronization (black bars) in CIDR-4 group. While pregnancy per AI in heifers with or without presynchronization were similar in CIDR-5 group.

Similar articles

References

    1. Wathes D.C., Pollott G.E., Johnson K.F., Richardson H., Cooke J.S. Heifer fertility and carry over consequences for life time production in dairy and beef cattle. Animal. 2014;8(Suppl. 1):91–104. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114000755. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eastham N.T., Coates A., Cripps P., Richardson H., Smith R., Oikonomou G. Associations between age at first calving and subsequent lactation performance in UK Holstein and Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197764. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Savio J.D., Keenan L., Boland M.P., Roche J.F. Pattern of growth of dominant follicles during the oestrous cycle of heifers. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1988;83:663–671. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0830663. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pursley J.R., Wiltbank M.C., Stevenson J.S., Ottobre J.S., Garverick H.A., Anderson L.L. Pregnancy rates per artificial insemination for cows and heifers inseminated at a synchronized ovulation or synchronized estrus. J. Dairy Sci. 1997;80:295–300. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75937-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rivera H., Lopez H., Fricke P.M. Use of intravaginal progesterone-releasing inserts in a synchronization protocol before timed AI and for synchronizing return to estrus in Holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;88:957–968. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72763-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources