Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 14;13(10):2380.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13102380.

MicroRNAs as Epigenetic Determinants of Treatment Response and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Review

MicroRNAs as Epigenetic Determinants of Treatment Response and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Prostate Cancer

Valentina Doldi et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common tumor in men worldwide, and the fifth leading cause of male cancer-related deaths in western countries. PC is a very heterogeneous disease, meaning that optimal clinical management of individual patients is challenging. Depending on disease grade and stage, patients can be followed in active surveillance protocols or undergo surgery, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and chemotherapy. Although therapeutic advancements exist in both radiatiotherapy and chemotherapy, in a considerable proportion of patients, the treatment remains unsuccessful, mainly due to tumor poor responsiveness and/or recurrence and metastasis. microRNAs (miRNAs), small noncoding RNAs that epigenetically regulate gene expression, are essential actors in multiple tumor-related processes, including apoptosis, cell growth and proliferation, autophagy, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, invasion, and metastasis. Given that these processes are deeply involved in cell response to anti-cancer treatments, miRNAs have been considered as key determinants of tumor treatment response. In this review, we provide an overview on main PCa-related miRNAs and describe the biological mechanisms by which specific miRNAs concur to determine PCa response to radiation and drug therapy. Additionally, we illustrate whether miRNAs can be considered novel therapeutic targets or tools on the basis of the consequences of their expression modulation in PCa experimental models.

Keywords: epigenetics; microRNA; prostate cancer; therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
miRNAs involved in PCa response to radiotherapy. Schematic representation of the main biological mechanisms by which listed miRNAs concur to determine PCa response to radiation. miRNAs enhancing treatment response are highlighted in blue, while miRNAs inducing treatment resistance are in red. The reported mechanisms include DNA damage repair (DDR), cell cycle, autophagy, apoptosis, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Graphical elements were created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
miRNAs involved in PCa drug treatment response. Schematic representation of the main biological mechanisms by which listed miRNAs concur to determine PCa response drug therapy. miRNAs enhancing treatment response are highlighted in blue, while miRNAs inducing treatment resistance are in red. The reported mechanisms include: androgen receptor (AR) signaling, drug efflux, apoptosis, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Graphical elements were created with BioRender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mottet N., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E., van den Broeck T., Cumberbatch M.G., de Santis M., Fanti S., Fossati N., Gandaglia G., Gillessen S., et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer—2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur. Urol. 2021;79:243–262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjurlin M.A., Carter H.B., Schellhammer P., Cookson M.S., Gomella L.G., Troyer D., Wheeler T.M., Schlossberg S., Penson D.F., Taneja S.S. Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: Sampling, labeling and specimen processing. J. Urol. 2013;189:2039–2046. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.072. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornford P., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E., van den Broeck T., Cumberbatch M.G., de Santis M., Fanti S., Fossati N., Gandaglia G., Gillessen S., et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II—2020 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2021;79:263–282. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruinsma S.M., Bangma C.H., Carroll P.R., Leapman M.S., Rannikko A., Petrides N., Weerakoon M., Bokhorst L.P., Roobol M.J. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: A narrative review of clinical guidelines. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2016;13:151–167. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.313. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources