Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 14;11(5):1415.
doi: 10.3390/ani11051415.

Does Bacteria Colonization of Canine Newborns Start in the Uterus?

Affiliations

Does Bacteria Colonization of Canine Newborns Start in the Uterus?

Ada Rota et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The assumption that requires the uterus to be a sterile environment to sustain a successful pregnancy has been recently challenged in humans, and is still under debate. The aim of this study was to assess whether bacteria can be isolated from the pregnant uterus and from amniotic fluid and meconium of healthy canine fetuses at term, delivered through cesarean section. Fifteen dams of different breed, age and parity, undergoing either elective (n = 10) or emergency (n = 5) cesarean section after a healthy pregnancy, were included in the study. Swabs for bacterial culture were collected from the uterus, and from amniotic fluid and meconium. Bacteria were isolated from all the sampled sites and materials, irrespective of cesarean type. In most cases, different bacteria were isolated from the different sites. Acinetobacter spp., coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Bacillus spp. were frequently found while Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Micrococcus spp., Moraxella spp., Macrococcus spp., Glutamicibacter spp., Stenotrophomonas spp. and Psychrobacter spp. were only occasionally identified. Our data show that uterus and fetuses may not be sterile in healthy term canine pregnancies.

Keywords: amniotic fluid; bacterial flora; dog; fetus; meconium; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferretti P., Pasolli E., Tett A., Asnicar F., Gorfer V., Fedi S., Armanini F., Truong D.T., Manara S., Zolfo M., et al. Mother-to-Infant Microbial Transmission from Different Body Sites Shapes the Developing Infant Gut Microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24:133–145.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.06.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perez-Muñoz M.E., Arrieta M.-C., Ramer-Tait A.E., Walter J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: Implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome. 2017;5:48. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0268-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stout M.J., Conlon B., Landeau M., Lee I., Bower C., Zhao Q., Roehl K.A., Nelson D.M., Macones G.A., Mysorekar I.U. Identification of intracellular bacteria in the basal plate of the human placenta in term and preterm gestations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;208:226.e1–226.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aagaard K., Ma J., Antony K.M., Ganu R., Petrosino J., Versalovic J. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:237ra65. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim E.S., Rodriguez C., Holtz L.R. Amniotic fluid from healthy term pregnancies does not harbor a detectable microbial community. Microbiome. 2018;6:87. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0475-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources