Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 14;11(5):636.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050636.

Inhibitory Dimensions and Delay of Gratification: A Comparative Study on Individuals with Down Syndrome and Typically Developing Children

Affiliations

Inhibitory Dimensions and Delay of Gratification: A Comparative Study on Individuals with Down Syndrome and Typically Developing Children

Martina Fontana et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

While previous research on inhibition in people with Down syndrome (DS) reported contradictory results, with no explicit theoretical model, on the other hand, a more homogeneous impaired profile on the delay of gratification skills emerged. The main goal of the present study was to investigate response inhibition, interference suppression, and delay of gratification in 51 individuals with DS matched for a measure of mental age (MA) with 71 typically developing (TD) children. Moreover, we cross-sectionally explored the strengths and weaknesses of these components in children and adolescents vs. adults with DS with the same MA. A battery of laboratory tasks tapping on inhibitory sub-components and delay of gratification was administrated. Results indicated that individuals with DS showed an overall worse performance compared to TD children on response inhibition and delay of gratification, while no differences emerged between the two samples on the interference suppression. Additionally, our results suggested that older individuals with DS outperformed the younger ones both in response inhibition and in the delay of gratification, whereas the interference suppression still remains impaired in adulthood. This study highlights the importance of evaluating inhibitory sub-components considering both MA and chronological age in order to promote more effective and evidence-based training for this population.

Keywords: Down syndrome; chronological age; delay of gratification; hot and cool executive functions; interference suppression; response inhibition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sherman S.L., Allen E.G., Bean L.H., Freeman S.B. Epidemiology of Down syndrome. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2007;13:221–227. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20157. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mégarbané A., Ravel A., Mircher C., Sturtz F., Grattau Y., Rethoré M.-O., Delabar J.-M., Mobley W.C. The 50th anniversary of the discovery of trisomy 21: The past, present, and future of research and treatment of Down syndrome. Genet. Med. 2009;11:611–616. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b2e34c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bittles A.H., Glasson E.J. Clinical, social, and ethical implications of changing life expectancy in Down syndrome. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2004;46:282. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2004.tb00483.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daunhauer L.A., Gerlach-McDonald B., Will E., Fidler D.J. Performance and Ratings Based Measures of Executive Function in School-Aged Children with Down Syndrome. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2017;42:351–368. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2017.1360303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pochon R., Touchet C., Ibernon L. Emotion Recognition in Adolescents with Down Syndrome: A Nonverbal Approach. Brain Sci. 2017;7:55. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7060055. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources