Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 14;22(10):5222.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22105222.

Mass Spectrometry-Based Glycoproteomics and Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Mass Spectrometry-Based Glycoproteomics and Prostate Cancer

Caterina Gabriele et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Aberrant glycosylation has long been known to be associated with cancer, since it is involved in key mechanisms such as tumour onset, development and progression. This review will focus on protein glycosylation studies in cells, tissue, urine and serum in the context of prostate cancer. A dedicated section will cover the glycoforms of prostate specific antigen, the molecule that, despite some important limitations, is routinely tested for helping prostate cancer diagnosis. Our aim is to provide readers with an overview of mass spectrometry-based glycoproteomics of prostate cancer. From this perspective, the first part of this review will illustrate the main strategies for glycopeptide enrichment and mass spectrometric analysis. The molecular information obtained by glycoproteomic analysis performed by mass spectrometry has led to new insights into the mechanism linking aberrant glycosylation to cancer cell proliferation, migration and immunoescape.

Keywords: PSA; SPEG; TiO2; biomarker discovery; glycocapture; protein glycosylation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bottom-up approach.
Figure 2
Figure 2
This figure is a simple representation of the enrichment methods.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Advantages and disadvantages for each sample type.
Figure 4
Figure 4
This figure shows the correlation between the alteration of tissue architecture and the increase of serum levels of PSA in PCa.

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D. Cancer Statisics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson I.M., Pauler D.K., Goodman P.J., Tangen C.M., Lucia M.S., Parnes H.L., Minasian L.M., Ford L.G., Lippman S.M., Crawford E.D., et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level ≤ 4.0 ng per milliliter. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350:2239–2246. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031918. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lumen N., Fonteyne V., De Meerleert G., Ost P., Villeirs G., Mottrie A., De Visschere P., De Troyer B., Oosterlinck W. Population screening for prostate cancer: An overview of available studies and meta-analysis. Int. J. Urol. 2012;19:100–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02912.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pin E., Fredolini C., Petricoin E.F. The role of proteomics in prostate cancer research: Biomarker discovery and validation. Clin. Biochem. 2013;46:524–538. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.12.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olsen J.V., Mann M. Status of large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteom. MCP. 2013;12:3444–3542. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O113.034181. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances