Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 19;18(10):5423.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105423.

Occupational Health Hazards: Employer, Employee, and Labour Union Concerns

Affiliations
Review

Occupational Health Hazards: Employer, Employee, and Labour Union Concerns

Oscar Rikhotso et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This review paper examines the extent of employer, worker, and labour union concerns to occupational health hazard exposure, as a function of previously reported and investigated complaints. Consequently, an online literature search was conducted, encompassing publicly available reports resulting from investigations, regulatory inspection, and enforcement activities conducted by relevant government structures from South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Of the three countries' government structures, the United States' exposure investigative activities conducted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health returned literature search results aligned to the study design, in the form of health hazard evaluation reports reposited on its online database. The main initiators of investigated exposure cases were employers, workers, and unions at 86% of the analysed health hazard evaluation reports conducted between 2000 and 2020. In the synthesised literature, concerns to exposure from chemical and physical hazards were substantiated by occupational hygiene measurement outcomes confirming excessive exposures above regulated health and safety standards in general. Recommendations to abate the confirmed excessive exposures were made in all cases, highlighting the scientific value of occupational hygiene measurements as a basis for exposure control, informing risk and hazard perception. Conclusively, all stakeholders at the workplace should have adequate risk perception to trigger abatement measures.

Keywords: chemical and physical hazards; health and safety standards; health hazard evaluation; risk perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. [(accessed on 18 June 2020)]; Available online: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/oshact/completeoshact.
    1. Occupational Health and Safety Act and Regulations (85 of 1993) [(accessed on 26 November 2018)]; Available online: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/act85of1993.pdf.
    1. United Kingdom Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. [(accessed on 4 May 2020)]; Available online: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukga/1974/37/contents.
    1. United Kingdom The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. [(accessed on 26 July 2020)]; Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/3242/contents/made.
    1. The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013. [(accessed on 14 May 2021)]; Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1471/contents/made.