Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 18;11(5):750.
doi: 10.3390/biom11050750.

Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?

Affiliations
Review

Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?

Kiyohiro Ando et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Unrestrained proliferation is a common feature of malignant neoplasms. Targeting the cell cycle is a therapeutic strategy to prevent unlimited cell division. Recently developed rationales for these selective inhibitors can be subdivided into two categories with antithetical functionality. One applies a "brake" to the cell cycle to halt cell proliferation, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle kinases. The other "accelerates" the cell cycle to initiate replication/mitotic catastrophe, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. The fate of cell cycle progression or arrest is tightly regulated by the presence of tolerable or excessive DNA damage, respectively. This suggests that there is compatibility between inhibitors of DNA repair kinases, such as PARP inhibitors, and inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. In the present review, we explore alterations to the cell cycle that are concomitant with altered DNA damage repair machinery in unfavorable neuroblastomas, with respect to their unique genomic and molecular features. We highlight the vulnerabilities of these alterations that are attributable to the features of each. Based on the assessment, we offer possible therapeutic approaches for personalized medicine, which are seemingly antithetical, but both are promising strategies for targeting the altered cell cycle in unfavorable neuroblastomas.

Keywords: 11q loss; DNA damage response; MYCN; RAS; cell cycle; checkpoint; inhibitor; neuroblastoma; replication stress; telomere.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of responsible molecules for applying “brakes” on the neuroblastoma cell cycle. Current druggable targets were depicted.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of responsible molecules for the “acceleration” of the neuroblastoma cell cycle. Current druggable targets are depicted. Possible catastrophic cell deaths caused by oncogenic stresses are shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic representation of candidate targeted drugs for two types of unfavorable neuroblastomas. (A) MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma, (B) non-MYCN amplified neuroblastoma with 11q loss. Red T-bars indicate putting the “brakes” on the cell cycle. Blue arrows indicate “acceleration” of the cell cycle.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nakagawara A., Li Y., Izumi H., Muramori K., Inada H., Nishi M. Neuroblastoma. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;48:214–241. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx176. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohn S.L., Pearson A.D., London W.B., Monclair T., Ambros P.F., Brodeur G.M., Faldum A., Hero B., Iehara T., Machin D., et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: An INRG Task Force report. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27:289–297. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinto N.R., Applebaum M.A., Volchenboum S.L., Matthay K.K., London W.B., Ambros P.F., Nakagawara A., Berthold F., Schleiermacher G., Park J.R., et al. Advances in Risk Classification and Treatment Strategies for Neuroblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:3008–3017. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4648. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knoepfler P.S., Cheng P.F., Eisenman R.N. N-myc is essential during neurogenesis for the rapid expansion of progenitor cell populations and the inhibition of neuronal differentiation. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2699–2712. doi: 10.1101/gad.1021202. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hermeking H., Rago C., Schuhmacher M., Li Q., Barrett J.F., Obaya A.J., O’Connell B.C., Mateyak M.K., Tam W., Kohlhuber F., et al. Identification of CDK4 as a target of c-MYC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:2229–2234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.050586197. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding