Positive Human Contact and Housing Systems Impact the Responses of Piglets to Various Stressors
- PMID: 34070802
- PMCID: PMC8227335
- DOI: 10.3390/ani11061619
Positive Human Contact and Housing Systems Impact the Responses of Piglets to Various Stressors
Abstract
This experiment studied the effects of lactation housing systems and human interaction on piglets' responses to routine stressors. Forty litters of piglets were reared in either a standard farrowing crate (FC) or a loose farrowing and lactation pen (LP; PigSAFE pen) and received either routine contact with humans (C) or regular opportunities for positive human contact (+HC; 3 min of patting, stroking and scratching 5 times/week). Behavioural and physiological responses to routine husbandry procedures, weaning, novelty and humans were studied in addition to effects on piglet growth, injuries and survival. Compared to C piglets, +HC piglets vocalised for shorter durations (p = 0.018) during husbandry procedures and showed a lower intensity of escape behaviour during iron injection (p = 0.042) and oral vaccination (p = 0.026) at 3 d of age, capture at 2 wk of age (p < 0.001), and intramuscular vaccination (p = 0.005) at 3 wk of age. +HC piglets at 2 wk of age were faster than C piglets to approach (p = 0.048) and interact (p = 0.042) with a stationary unfamiliar human. Compared to LP piglets, FC piglets showed a lower intensity of escape behaviour during capture and iron administration by a stockperson at 3 d of age (p = 0.043). FC piglets at 2 wk of age were faster than LP piglets to approach (p = 0.005) and interact (p = 0.027) with a novel object and approach (p = 0.009) and interact (p = 0.008) with an unfamiliar human. FC piglets had fewer injuries than LP piglets at 2 wk of age (p = 0.004). +HC pigs had fewer injuries than C pigs after weaning (p = 0.003). After weaning there were more pigs from LP than FC observed to be upright (both stationary, p = 0.002 and walking, p = 0.024), vocalizing (p = 0.004), nosing another pig (p = 0.035) and nosing the pen floor (p = 0.038). There were no significant effects on neutrophil:lymphocyte ratios or plasma cortisol concentrations 1.5 h after weaning. However, 25 h after weaning +HC pigs had higher haptoglobin concentrations than C pigs (p = 0.002), and C/LP pigs had higher cortisol concentrations than +HC/LP and C/FC pigs (p = 0.012). There were no significant effects on piglet growth, the number of piglets born alive or the number stillborn, however there were more piglets weaned from FC than LP (p = 0.035). The results from this experiment raise questions that require further research on the ability of pigs reared in loose pens to cope with stressors such as exposure to humans, novelty, husbandry procedures and weaning. This experiment also provides evidence that regular positive human interaction reduces pigs' fear of humans and husbandry procedures imposed by stockpeople. More research is required to determine if any of these effects are sustained long-term.
Keywords: early life experiences; handling; housing; pig welfare; positive human contact.
Conflict of interest statement
Rebecca S. Morrison is an employee of Rivalea Australia which provided financial support for this research.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 3: ability to cope with the environment.Animal. 2024 Jun;18(6):101166. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101166. Epub 2024 Apr 17. Animal. 2024. PMID: 38772077
-
Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 2: resilience to routine husbandry practices.Animal. 2024 Jun;18(6):101165. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101165. Epub 2024 Apr 18. Animal. 2024. PMID: 38776694
-
Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 1: responses to humans, novelty and isolation.Animal. 2024 Jun;18(6):101164. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101164. Epub 2024 Apr 17. Animal. 2024. PMID: 38761440
-
Review: Early life piglet experiences and impacts on immediate and longer-term adaptability.Animal. 2024 Jun;18 Suppl 1:100889. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100889. Epub 2023 Jun 22. Animal. 2024. PMID: 37468352 Review.
-
Impact of housing environment and management on pre-/post-weaning piglet productivity.J Anim Sci. 2022 Jun 1;100(6):skac142. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac142. J Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 35708591 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Affective Implications of Human-Animal Relationship on Pig Welfare: Integrating Non-Linear Heart Rate Variability Measures.Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;14(15):2217. doi: 10.3390/ani14152217. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39123743 Free PMC article.
-
On your terms or mine: pigs' response to imposed gentle tactile contact vs. free form interaction with a familiar human.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):25249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76451-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39448780 Free PMC article.
-
Transitioning from crates to free farrowing: A roadmap to navigate key decisions.Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 14;9:998192. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.998192. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2022. PMID: 36452143 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare.Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;12(4):487. doi: 10.3390/ani12040487. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35203194 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Iacoviella B.M., Charney D.S. Cognitive and behavioral components of resilience to stress. In: Chen A., editor. Stress Resilience: Molecular and Behavioral Aspects. Academic Press; London, UK: 2019. p. 23.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous