Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 28;11(6):1583.
doi: 10.3390/ani11061583.

Unraveling the Relationship between Milk Yield and Quality at the Test Day with Rumination Time Recorded by a PLF Technology

Affiliations

Unraveling the Relationship between Milk Yield and Quality at the Test Day with Rumination Time Recorded by a PLF Technology

Rosanna Marino et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The study aimed to estimate the components of rumination time (RT) variability recorded by a neck collar sensor and the relationship between RT and milk composition. Milk test day (TD) and RT data were collected from 691 cows in three farms. Daily RT data of each animal were averaged for 3, 7, and 10 days preceding the TD date (RTD). Variance component analysis of RTD, considering the effects of farm, cow, parity, TD date, and lactation phase, showed that a farm, followed by a cow, had major contributions to the total variability. The RT10 variable best performed on TD milk yield and quality records across models by a multi-model inference approach and was adopted to study its relationship with milk traits, by linear mixed models, through a 3-level stratification: low (LRT10 ≤ 8 h/day), medium (8 h/day < MRT10 ≤ 9 h/day), and high (HRT10 > 9 h/day) RT. Cows with HRT10 had greater milk, fat, protein, casein, and lactose daily yield, and lower fat, protein, casein contents, and fat to protein ratio compared to MRT10 and LRT10. Higher percentages of saturated fatty acid and lower unsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acid were found in HRT10, with respect to LRT10 and MRT10 observations.

Keywords: milk quality; precision livestock farming; rumination time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of standard deviation (SD) of rumination time (RT), calculated for each cow considering a period of: (a) three (RT3), (b) seven (RT7), and (c) ten (RT10) days preceding each test day date. Rumination time was measured with a neck collar (SCR Heatime® HR System, Engineers Ltd., Netanya, Israel). In the figure min/d = minute/day.

References

    1. Gengler N. Symposium review: Challenges and opportunities for evaluating and using the genetic potential of dairy cattle in the new era of sensor data from automation. J. Dairy Sci. 2019;102:5756–5763. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15711. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moran J. Tropical Dairy Farming: Feeding Management for Small Holder Dairy Farmers in the Humid Tropics. Landlinks Press; Collingwood, Australia: 2005. How the rumen works; pp. 41–49. Chapter 5.
    1. Adin G., Solomon R., Nikbachat M., Zenou A., Yosef E., Brosh A., Shabtay A., Mabjeesh S.J., Halachmi I., Miron J. Effect of feeding cows in early lactation with diets differing in roughage-neutral detergent fiber content on intake behavior, rumination, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:3364–3373. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2078. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abeni F., Galli A. Monitoring cow activity and rumination time for an early detection of heat stress in dairy cow. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2017;61:417–425. doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1222-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soriani N., Panella G., Calamari L. Rumination time during the summer season and its relationships with metabolic conditions and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 2013;96:5082–5094. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6620. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources