Fraud Detection in Batches of Sweet Almonds by Portable Near-Infrared Spectral Devices
- PMID: 34071284
- PMCID: PMC8229702
- DOI: 10.3390/foods10061221
Fraud Detection in Batches of Sweet Almonds by Portable Near-Infrared Spectral Devices
Abstract
One of the key challenges for the almond industry is how to detect the presence of bitter almonds in commercial batches of sweet almonds. The main aim of this research is to assess the potential of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) by means of using portable instruments in the industry to detect batches of sweet almonds which have been adulterated with bitter almonds. To achieve this, sweet almonds and non-sweet almonds (bitter almonds and mixtures of sweet almonds with different percentages (from 5% to 20%) of bitter almonds) were analysed using a new generation of portable spectrophotometers. Three strategies (only bitter almonds, bitter almonds and mixtures, and only mixtures) were used to optimise the construction of the non-sweet almond training set. Models developed using partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) correctly classified 86-100% of samples, depending on the instrument used and the strategy followed for constructing the non-sweet almond training set. These results confirm that NIR spectroscopy provides a reliable, accurate method for detecting the presence of bitter almonds in batches of sweet almonds, with up to 5% adulteration levels (lower levels should be tested in future studies), and that this technology can be readily used at the main steps of the production chain.
Keywords: almond batches; authentication; in situ NIR spectroscopy; non-destructive assessment; non-targeted fraud detection.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper in any way.
Figures




References
-
- Morin J.F., Lees M. Food Integrity Handbook: A Guide to Food Authenticity Issues and Analytical Solutions. Eurofins Analytics France; Nantes, France: 2018.
-
- Ali Meerza S.Y., Giannakas K., Yiannaka A. Markets and welfare effects of food fraud. Aust. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 2019;63:759–789. doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.12348. - DOI
-
- Ali Meerza S.Y., Gustafson C.R. Consumers’ response to food fraud: Evidence from experimental auctions. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2020;45:219–231. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.302451. - DOI
-
- Pérez-Marín D., Calero L., Fearn T., Torres I., Garrido-Varo A., Sánchez M.T. A system using in situ NIRS sensors for the detection of product failing to meet quality standards and the prediction of optimal postharvest shelf-life in the case of oranges kept in cold storage. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2019;147:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.09.009. - DOI
-
- Pérez-Marín D., Garrido A. NIR sensors for the in-situ assessment of Iberian ham. In: Cifuentes A., editor. Comprehensive Foodomics. Elsevier; Oxford, UK: 2020. pp. 340–345.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous