Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 28;13(11):2664.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13112664.

Advances in Multidisciplinary Management of Skull Base Meningiomas

Affiliations
Review

Advances in Multidisciplinary Management of Skull Base Meningiomas

Tamara Ius et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The surgical management of Skull Base Meningiomas (SBMs) has radically changed over the last two decades. Extensive surgery for patients with SBMs represents the mainstream treatment; however, it is often challenging due to narrow surgical corridors and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Novel surgical technologies, including three-dimensional (3D) preoperative imaging, neuromonitoring, and surgical instruments, have gradually facilitated the surgical resectability of SBMs, reducing postoperative morbidity. Total removal is not always feasible considering a risky tumor location and invasion of surrounding structures and brain parenchyma. In recent years, the use of primary or adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has progressively increased due to its safety and efficacy in the control of grade I and II meningiomas, especially for small to moderate size lesions. Patients with WHO grade SBMs receiving subtotal surgery can be monitored over time with surveillance imaging. Postoperative management remains highly controversial for grade II meningiomas, and depends on the presence of residual disease, with optional upfront adjuvant radiation therapy or close surveillance imaging in cases with total resection. Adjuvant radiation is strongly recommended in patients with grade III tumors. Although the currently available chemotherapy or targeted therapies available have a low efficacy, the molecular profiling of SBMs has shown genetic alterations that could be potentially targeted with novel tailored treatments. This multidisciplinary review provides an update on the advances in surgical technology, postoperative management and molecular profile of SBMs.

Keywords: 3D virtual planning; radiosurgery; radiotherapy; skull base meningioma; surgery; systemic treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulated transfacial accesses using virtual models in clival meningiomas: (A) Le Fort I transmaxillary access; (B) transfacial maxillary-split approach. The bone flap is represented in green color, while the tumor mass is represented in pink color.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Relative frequencies in SBM locations are stratified and shown with circles of progressively wider diameter; (B) Topological subdivision of skull base: anterior skull base is shown in blue, middle skull base is shown in brown, and posterior skull base is shown in green; (C) Anatomical area for which endoscopic endonasal approach can be used.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Workflow for the standard treatment options in SBMs. When a “wait and see” approach is chosen, MRI is performed every 6 months. If patients remain asymptomatic, MRI is performed annually after 5 years. For WHO grade III SBMs, fSRT is recommended across all surgical resection classes. WHO, World Health Organization; fSRT, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery.

References

    1. Ostrom Q.T., Gittleman H., Truitt G., Boscia A., Kruchko C., Barnholtz-Sloan J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro-Oncology. 2018;20:iv1–iv86. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy131. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louis D.N., Perry A., Reifenberger G., von Deimling A., Figarella-Branger D., Cavenee W.K., Ohgaki H., Wiestler O.D., Kleihues P., Ellison D.W. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simpson D. The Recurrence of Intracranial Meningiomas after Surgical Treatment. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1957;20:22–39. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.20.1.22. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flood L.M. In: Meningiomas of the Skull Base: Treatment Nuances in Contemporary Neurosurgery. Cappabianca P., Solari D., editors. Thieme; Stuttgart, NY, USA: 2018.
    1. Nanda A., Bir S.C., Maiti T.K., Konar S.K., Missios S., Guthikonda B. Relevance of Simpson Grading System and Recurrence-Free Survival after Surgery for World Health Organization Grade I Meningioma. J. Neurosurg. 2017;126:201–211. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS151842. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources