Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 28;18(11):5822.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115822.

Empowerment and Employee Well-Being: A Mediation Analysis Study

Affiliations

Empowerment and Employee Well-Being: A Mediation Analysis Study

Juan A Marin-Garcia et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between structural and psychological empowerment and its effects on employees' psychological, physical, and social well-being. Despite the quantity of previously published works, empirical evidence about these relationships in the workplace is scarce. We developed a mediation model in which structural empowerment predicts employee well-being via psychological empowerment. We based our study on the EU-27 data from the 6th European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS). Data were collected from a questionnaire administered face-to-face to a random sample of employees and the self-employed representative of the working population in the European Union (number of valid responses in this study: 23,468). The effects of the relationships among the variables considered were evaluated using Partial Least Squares (PLS). Results indicate that structural empowerment was positively related to psychological empowerment, which was positively related to job satisfaction, work engagement, and social well-being. The expected relationships for work stress and physical well-being were not found.

Keywords: Europe; empowering leadership; empowerment at work; physical health; psychological health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simplified model representation. Values inside circles are R2. All paths are statistically significant. H3 was tested comparing direct paths from SE to well-being variables with the corresponding indirect paths (H1xH2a; H1xH2b and H1xH2c).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sanchez-Ruiz L., Marin-Garcia J.A., Blanco B. Protocol: A meta-review on continuous improvement to know the state of this research field. WPOM Work. Pap. Oper. Manag. 2018;9 doi: 10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10752. - DOI
    1. da Fonseca L.M.C.M. Iso 14001:2015: An improved tool for sustainability. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2015;8:37–50. doi: 10.3926/jiem.1298. - DOI
    1. Gollan P., Kalfa S., Agarwal R., Green R., Randhawa K. Lean manufacturing as a high-performance work system: The case of Cochlear. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2014;52:6434–6447. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.940430. - DOI
    1. Siddique M., Procter S., Gittell J.H. The role of relational coordination in the relationship between high-performance work systems (HPWS) and organizational performance. J. Organ. Eff. People Perform. 2019;6:246–266. doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-04-2018-0029. - DOI
    1. Singh S., Ramakrishna S., Gupta M.K. Towards zero waste manufacturing: A multidisciplinary review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017;168:1230–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.108. - DOI