Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 28;11(6):495.
doi: 10.3390/life11060495.

Functional Weight of Somatic and Cognitive Networks and Asymmetry of Compensatory Mechanisms: Collaboration or Divergency among Hemispheres after Cerebrovascular Accident?

Affiliations
Review

Functional Weight of Somatic and Cognitive Networks and Asymmetry of Compensatory Mechanisms: Collaboration or Divergency among Hemispheres after Cerebrovascular Accident?

Hélène Viruega et al. Life (Basel). .

Abstract

The human brain holds highly sophisticated compensatory mechanisms relying on neuroplasticity. Neuronal degeneracy, redundancy, and brain network organization make the human nervous system more robust and evolvable to continuously guarantee an optimal environmental-related homeostasis. Nevertheless, after injury, restitution processes appear dissimilar, depending on the pathology. Following a cerebrovascular accident, asymmetry, within- and across-network compensation and interhemispheric inhibition are key features to functional recovery. In moderate-to-severe stroke, neurological outcome is often poor, and little is known about the paths that enable either an efficient collaboration among hemispheres or, on the contrary, an antagonism of adaptative responses. In this review, we aim to decipher key issues of ipsilesional and contralesional hemispheric functioning allowing the foundations of effective neurorehabilitation strategies.

Keywords: across-network compensation; adaptive neuroplasticity; brain asymmetry; brain homeostasis; cerebrovascular accident; intercallosal processes; maladaptive neuroplasticity; neurorehabilitation; within-network compensation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Breakspear M., Stam C.J. Dynamics of a neural system with a multiscale architecture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 2005;360:1051–1074. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1643. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bullmore E., Sporns O. Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009;10:186–198. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tononi G., Sporns O., Edelman G.M. A measure for brain complexity: Relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:5033–5037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartwigsen G. Flexible Redistribution in Cognitive Networks. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2018;22:687–698. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fornito A., Zalesky A., Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015;16:159–172. doi: 10.1038/nrn3901. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources