Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 27;13(6):382.
doi: 10.3390/toxins13060382.

Mycotoxins Exposure of French Grain Elevator Workers: Biomonitoring and Airborne Measurements

Affiliations

Mycotoxins Exposure of French Grain Elevator Workers: Biomonitoring and Airborne Measurements

Sophie Ndaw et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

It is now recognized that additional exposure to mycotoxins may occur through inhalation of contaminated dust at a workplace. The aim of this study was to characterize the multi-mycotoxin exposure of French grain elevator workers using biomonitoring and airborne measurements. Eighteen workers participated in the study. Personal airborne dust samples were analyzed for their mycotoxin concentrations. Workers provided multiple urine samples including pre-shift, post-shift and first morning urine samples or 24 h urine samples. Mycotoxin urinary biomarkers (aflatoxin B1, aflatoxin M1, ochratoxin A, ochratoxin α, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, α-zearalenol, β-zearalenol, fumonisin B1, HT-2 toxin and T-2 toxin) were measured using a liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry method. Grain elevator workers were highly exposed to organic airborne dust (median 4.92 mg.m-3). DON, ZEN and FB1 were frequent contaminants in 54, 76 and 72% of air samples, respectively. The mycotoxin biomarkers quantified were DON (98%), ZEN (99%), α-ZEL (52%), β-ZEL (33%), OTA (76%), T-2 (4%) and HT-2 (4%). DON elimination profiles showed highest concentrations in samples collected after the end of the work shift and the urinary DON concentrations were significantly higher in post-shift than in pre-shift-samples (9.9 and 22.1 µg/L, respectively). ZEN and its metabolites concentrations did not vary according to the sampling time. However, the levels of α-/β-ZEL were consistent with an additional occupational exposure. These data provide valuable information on grain worker exposure to mycotoxins. They also highlight the usefulness of multi-mycotoxin methods in assessing external and internal exposures, which shed light on the extent and pathways of exposure occurring in occupational settings.

Keywords: HR-MS/MS; air; biomonitoring; dust; exposure assessment; grain workers; mycotoxins; occupational exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Individual kinetic profiles of urinary DON excretion over the sampling week. Plot of urinary DON concentration (µg/g) versus time for (a) workers from elevator A1 (worker 1 and worker 2) and (b) workers from elevator B (worker 3 and worker 4). Plain bars represent the work shift periods. x represents samples in which creatinine value is out of range ((creat) < 0.5 g/L or >3 g/L). Number of years of activity: 15 (worker 1), 9 (worker 2), 17 (worker 3), 4 (worker 4).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot showing post-shift urinary (a) DON, (b) ZEN and (c) α-ZEL concentrations (µg/g) versus airborne mycotoxin concentrations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Straumfors A., Heldal K.K., Wouters I.I., Eduard W. Work Tasks as Determinants of Grain Dust and Microbial Exposure in the Norwegian Grain and Compound Feed Industry. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2015;59:724–736. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eduard W., Heederik D., Duchaine C., Green B.J. Bioaerosol exposure assessment in the workplace: The past, present and recent advances. J. Environ. Monit. 2012;14:334–339. doi: 10.1039/c2em10717a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Da Rocha M.E.B., Freire F.D.O., Maia F.B.F., Guedes M.I.F., Rondina D. Mycotoxins and their effects on human and animal health. Food Control. 2014;36:159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.08.021. - DOI
    1. Jargot D., Melin S. Characterization and validation of sampling and analytical methods for mycotoxins in workplace air. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 2013;15:633–644. doi: 10.1039/c2em30566f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Straumfors A., Uhlig S., Eriksen G.S., Heldal K.K., Eduard W., Krska R., Sulyok M. Mycotoxins and other fungal metabolites in grain dust from Norwegian grain elevators and compound feed mills. World Mycotoxin J. 2015;8:361–373. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2014.1799. - DOI