Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 27;10(6):1208.
doi: 10.3390/foods10061208.

Influence of Various Factors on Caffeine Content in Coffee Brews

Affiliations
Review

Influence of Various Factors on Caffeine Content in Coffee Brews

Ewa Olechno et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Coffee brews are one of the most popular drinks. They are consumed for caffeine and its stimulant properties. The study aimed to summarize data on the influence of various factors on caffeine content in brews prepared with different methods. The study was carried out using a literature review from 2010-2020. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched. Data on caffeine content was collected by analyzing the following factors: the influence of species, brewing time, water temperature, pressure, degree of roast, grinding degree, water type, water/coffee ratio as well as other factors (such as geographical origin). To sum up, converting caffeine content to 1 L of the brew, the highest content is that of brews prepared in an espresso machine (portafilter), with the amount of 7.5 g of a coffee blend (95% Robusta + 5% Arabica), and water (the volume of coffee brew was 25 mL) at a temperature of 92 °C and a pressure of 7 bar, but the highest content in one portion was detected in a brew of 50 g of Robusta coffee poured with 500 mL of cold water (25 °C) and boiled.

Keywords: Arabica; Robusta; brewing time; caffeine; coffee roasting; coffee/water ratio; origin; pressure; temperature of water; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Miran J. Space, mobility, and translocal connections across the Red Sea area since 1500. Northeast Afr. Stud. 2012;12:9–26. doi: 10.1353/nas.2012.0038. - DOI
    1. Mussatto S.I., Machado E.M., Martins S., Teixeira J.A. Production, composition, and application of coffee and its industrial residues. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011;4:661–672. doi: 10.1007/s11947-011-0565-z. - DOI
    1. Maghuly F., Jankowicz-Cieslak J., Bado S. Improving coffee species for pathogen resistance. CAB Rev. 2020;15:1–18. doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR202015009. - DOI
    1. Mishra K.M., Nishani S., Jayarama Molecular identification and genetic relationships among coffee species (Coffea L.) inferred from ISSR and SRAP marker analyses. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2011;63:667–679. doi: 10.2298/ABS1103667M. - DOI
    1. Davis A.P., Chadburn H., Moat J., O’Sullivan R., Hargreaves S., Lughadha E.N. High extinction risk for wild coffee species and implications for coffee sector sustainability. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaav3473. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3473. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources