Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 27;9(6):1151.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061151.

Oak (Quercus robur) Associated Endophytic Paenibacillus sp. Promotes Poplar (Populus spp.) Root Growth In Vitro

Affiliations

Oak (Quercus robur) Associated Endophytic Paenibacillus sp. Promotes Poplar (Populus spp.) Root Growth In Vitro

Dorotėja Vaitiekūnaitė et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Soil fertilization is necessary for high-demand crop production in agriculture and forestry. Our current dependence on chemical fertilizers has significant harmful side effects. Biofertilization using microorganisms is a sustainable way to limit the need for chemical fertilizers in various enterprises. Most plant endophytic bacteria have thus far been unstudied for their plant growth promoting potential and hence present a novel niche for new biofertilizer strains. We isolated English oak (Quercus robur) endophytic bacteria and tested them for plant growth promoting traits (PGPTs) such as nitrogen fixation, phosphate mineralization/solubilization, siderophore and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production. We also investigated the effect the selected isolate had on poplar (Populus spp.) microshoot vegetative growth parameters in vitro. In total 48 bacterial strains were isolated, attributed to Bacillus, Delftia, Paenibacillus, Pantoea and Pseudomonas genera. All the isolates displayed at least three PGPTs, with 39.6% of the isolates displaying all five (all were Pseudomonas spp.) and 18.75% displaying four. Based on relative abundance, Paenibacillus sp. isolate was selected for the poplar microshoot inoculation study. The isolate had a significant positive effect on poplar microshoot root growth and development. Two tested poplar genotypes both had increased lateral root number and density, fresh and dry root biomass. Furthermore, one genotype had increased length and number of adventitious roots as well as a decrease in fresh aboveground biomass. The root enhancement was attributed to IAA production. We propose this isolate for further studies as a potential biofertilizer.

Keywords: Paenibacillus; Populus; Quercus robur; bacteria; biofertilizer; endophyte; in vitro, microshoots; plant growth promotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of plant growth promoting trait tests: (A) bacterial growth on Jensen’s medium, indicating putative nitrogen fixation capabilities, (B) orange zones on Chromeazul S (CAS) medium, indicating siderophore production, (C) supernatant color change to red after addition of Salkowski reagent, indicating indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production, (D,E) clear zones in insoluble phosphate enriched media, indicating phosphate mineralization and solubilization respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Paenibacillus sp. inoculated P. tremula microshoots after 2–3 weeks (A) and after 2 months (B) of incubation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of Paenibacillus sp. inoculation on P. tremula microshoots in vitro after 2-month incubation. On average lateral root number (a) and density (b) increased by 44.7% and 66% respectively, fresh root biomass (c) increased by 101.9% and dry root biomass (d) by 63.6% (average from 30 explants ± SD, **—p ≤ 0.01, ***—p ≤ 0.001, ****—p ≤ 0.0001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of Paenibacillus sp. inoculation on P. tremula × P. alba microshoots in vitro after 2-month incubation. On average lateral root number (a) and density (b) increased by 213.7% and 125.6% respectively, dry root biomass (c) increased by 144.8%. Adventitious roots were also affected, on average their sum length (d) increased by 102% and the number of adventitious roots (e) increased by 65% (average from 30 explants ± SD, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kour D., Rana K.L., Yadav A.N., Yadav N., Kumar M., Kumar V., Vyas P., Dhaliwal H.S., Saxena A.K. Microbial biofertilizers: Bioresources and eco-friendly technologies for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020;23:101487. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101487. - DOI
    1. García-Fraile P., Menendez E., Rivas R. Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2015;2:183–205. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.183. - DOI
    1. Suhag M. Potential of Biofertilizers to Replace Chemical Fertilizers. Int. Adv. Res. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2016;3:163–167.
    1. Pirttilä A.M., Mohammad Parast Tabas H., Baruah N., Koskimäki J.J. Biofertilizers and Biocontrol Agents for Agriculture: How to Identify and Develop New Potent Microbial Strains and Traits. Microorganisms. 2021;9:817. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040817. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suman A., Yadav A.N., Verma P. Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity: Vol. 1: Research Perspectives. Springer; New Delhi, India: 2016. Endophytic microbes in crops: Diversity and beneficial impact for sustainable agriculture; pp. 117–143. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources