Oak (Quercus robur) Associated Endophytic Paenibacillus sp. Promotes Poplar (Populus spp.) Root Growth In Vitro
- PMID: 34072105
- PMCID: PMC8226815
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9061151
Oak (Quercus robur) Associated Endophytic Paenibacillus sp. Promotes Poplar (Populus spp.) Root Growth In Vitro
Abstract
Soil fertilization is necessary for high-demand crop production in agriculture and forestry. Our current dependence on chemical fertilizers has significant harmful side effects. Biofertilization using microorganisms is a sustainable way to limit the need for chemical fertilizers in various enterprises. Most plant endophytic bacteria have thus far been unstudied for their plant growth promoting potential and hence present a novel niche for new biofertilizer strains. We isolated English oak (Quercus robur) endophytic bacteria and tested them for plant growth promoting traits (PGPTs) such as nitrogen fixation, phosphate mineralization/solubilization, siderophore and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production. We also investigated the effect the selected isolate had on poplar (Populus spp.) microshoot vegetative growth parameters in vitro. In total 48 bacterial strains were isolated, attributed to Bacillus, Delftia, Paenibacillus, Pantoea and Pseudomonas genera. All the isolates displayed at least three PGPTs, with 39.6% of the isolates displaying all five (all were Pseudomonas spp.) and 18.75% displaying four. Based on relative abundance, Paenibacillus sp. isolate was selected for the poplar microshoot inoculation study. The isolate had a significant positive effect on poplar microshoot root growth and development. Two tested poplar genotypes both had increased lateral root number and density, fresh and dry root biomass. Furthermore, one genotype had increased length and number of adventitious roots as well as a decrease in fresh aboveground biomass. The root enhancement was attributed to IAA production. We propose this isolate for further studies as a potential biofertilizer.
Keywords: Paenibacillus; Populus; Quercus robur; bacteria; biofertilizer; endophyte; in vitro, microshoots; plant growth promotion.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Culturable endophytic bacteria of Camellia species endowed with plant growth promoting characteristics.J Appl Microbiol. 2019 Sep;127(3):825-844. doi: 10.1111/jam.14356. Epub 2019 Jul 10. J Appl Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31216598
-
Screening and characterization of endophytic Bacillus and Paenibacillus strains from medicinal plant Lonicera japonica for use as potential plant growth promoters.Braz J Microbiol. 2015 Oct-Dec;46(4):977-89. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838246420140024. Braz J Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 26691455 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of Arsenic-Resistant Endophytic Bacteria From Alfalfa and Chickpea Plants.Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 22;12:696750. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.696750. eCollection 2021. Front Plant Sci. 2021. PMID: 34367218 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of N2-fixing plant growth promoting endophytic and epiphytic bacterial community of Indian cultivated and wild rice (Oryza spp.) genotypes.Planta. 2016 Mar;243(3):799-812. doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2444-8. Epub 2015 Dec 22. Planta. 2016. PMID: 26696397
-
Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: a review.Microb Cell Fact. 2016 Dec 1;15(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0603-7. Microb Cell Fact. 2016. PMID: 27905924 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Differentiation of Closely Related Oak-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteria by Label-Free Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS).Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):1969. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091969. Microorganisms. 2021. PMID: 34576865 Free PMC article.
-
An updated view of bacterial endophytes as antimicrobial agents against plant and human pathogens.Curr Res Microb Sci. 2024 May 23;7:100241. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100241. eCollection 2024. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2024. PMID: 39091295 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Monilinia fructigena Suppressing and Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Pseudomonas spp. Bacteria Isolated from Plum.Microorganisms. 2022 Dec 3;10(12):2402. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122402. Microorganisms. 2022. PMID: 36557655 Free PMC article.
-
Introduction to Special Issue: Plant Microbiome Augmentation and Stimulation-New Strategies to Grow Crops with Reduced Agrochemicals.Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):1887. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091887. Microorganisms. 2021. PMID: 34576782 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Plant-Associated Bacteria on the In Vitro Growth and Pathogenic Resistance against Phellinus tremulae of Different Aspen (Populus) Genotypes.Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 7;9(9):1901. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091901. Microorganisms. 2021. PMID: 34576797 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kour D., Rana K.L., Yadav A.N., Yadav N., Kumar M., Kumar V., Vyas P., Dhaliwal H.S., Saxena A.K. Microbial biofertilizers: Bioresources and eco-friendly technologies for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020;23:101487. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101487. - DOI
-
- García-Fraile P., Menendez E., Rivas R. Role of bacterial biofertilizers in agriculture and forestry. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2015;2:183–205. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.183. - DOI
-
- Suhag M. Potential of Biofertilizers to Replace Chemical Fertilizers. Int. Adv. Res. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2016;3:163–167.
-
- Suman A., Yadav A.N., Verma P. Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity: Vol. 1: Research Perspectives. Springer; New Delhi, India: 2016. Endophytic microbes in crops: Diversity and beneficial impact for sustainable agriculture; pp. 117–143. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous