Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 29;10(6):873.
doi: 10.3390/antiox10060873.

Hydrogen Peroxide Increases during Endodormancy and Decreases during Budbreak in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Buds

Affiliations

Hydrogen Peroxide Increases during Endodormancy and Decreases during Budbreak in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Buds

Francisco Javier Pérez et al. Antioxidants (Basel). .

Abstract

Changes in the level of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a good indicator to monitor fluctuations in cellular metabolism and in the stress responses. In this study, the changes in H2O2 content during bud endodormancy (ED) and budbreak were analysed in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). The results showed a gradual increase in the H2O2 content during the development of bud ED, which was mainly due to an increase in the activity of peroxidases (PODs). The maximum H2O2 content reached in the grapevine buds coincided with the maximum depth of bud ED. In contrast, during budbreak, the H2O2 content decreased. As the plant hormones cytokinin (CK) and auxin play an important role in budbreak and growth resumption in grapevine, the effect of exogenous applications of H2O2 on the expression of genes involved in CK and auxin metabolism was analysed. The results showed that H2O2 represses the expression of the CK biosynthesis genes VvIPT3a and VvLOG1 and induces the expression of the CK-inactivating gene VvCKX3, thus reducing potentially the CK content in the grapevine bud. On the other hand, H2O2 induced the expression of the auxin biosynthesis genes VvAMI1 and VvYUC3 and of the auxin transporter gene VvPIN3, thus increasing potentially the auxin content and auxin transport in grapevine buds. In general, the results suggest that H2O2 in grapevine buds is associated with the depth of ED and negatively regulates its budbreak.

Keywords: auxin; budbreak; cytokinin; dormancy; grapevine buds; hydrogen peroxide; peroxidases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between the degree of endodormancy and H2O2 levels in Thompson seedless grapevine buds grown in Santiago, Chile. The degree of dormancy was determined by means of a log-rank test between the probabilistic function KM of the buds collected before (reference) and after the onset of the ED [26]. H2O2 was determined by a chemiluminescence method [29].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression of peroxidase genes (VvPODs), peroxidase activity and H2O2 levels during grape bud endodormancy. (a) Relationship between H2O2 levels and peroxidase activity (VvPOD) during endodormancy in Thompson seedless grapevine buds grown in Santiago, Chile. (b) Changes in the expression of peroxidase genes (VvPOD) throughout bud growth in Tempranillo grapevines grown in Alcalá de Henares, Madrid [21] and adapted to the Southern Hemisphere conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expression profile of RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGS (VvRBOHs) genes in grapevine buds during endodormancy. The expression profile of VvRBOH genes in Tempranillo grapevine buds grown in Alcalá de Henares, Madrid [21] and adapted to the Southern Hemisphere conditions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Catalase activity and expression of catalase genes in grapevine buds during endodormancy. (a) Catalase activity during endodormancy in Thompson seedless grapevine buds grown in Santiago, Chile. (b) Expression of catalase genes (VvCAT1 and VvCAT2) in buds of Tempranillo grapevines grown in Alcalá de Henares, Madrid [21] and adapted to the Southern Hemisphere conditions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Aminotriazole effect on H2O2 content and budbreak in grapevine buds. The effect of aminotriazole (a) on the level of H2O2 and (b) on the budbreak of Thompson seedless grapevine buds was analysed. Buds collected at June 11 were excised into single-bud cuttings and sprayed with 2.5% HC, 2% Aminotriazole and water as control. The treated single-bud cuttings were placed in the growth chamber and H2O2 was determined at the desired time by a chemiluminescence method [29]. Values are the average of three biological replicates ± SD; and (*) indicates statistically significance differences (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test α = 0.05). Buds collected at July 18 were excised into single-bud cuttings (30 per treatment) and sprayed with 2.5% HC, 2% Aminotriazole and water as control. The treated single-bud cuttings were placed in the growth chamber and budbreak was assessed by the presence of green tips.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Rate of H2O2 reduction in dormant and quiescent grapevine buds under forcing budbreak. Decreases in H2O2 content in (a) endodormant and (b) quiescent buds of Thompson seedless grapevines under forced growth conditions. H2O2 was determined by a chemiluminescence method [29]. Values are the average of three biological replicates ± SD; (*) indicates statistically significance differences. Student’s test (α = 0.05).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Transcriptional effect of H2O2 on the homeostasis of CK and auxin related genes. Effect of H2O2 applications on the expression of (a) cytokinin (CK) VvIPT3a, VvLOG1, and VvCKX3 and (b) auxin VvAMI1, VvYUC3 and VvPIN3 genes. Gene expression analysis was performed by RT-qPCR and normalised against VvUBIQITIN. Values are the average of three biological replicates with three technical repetitions ± SD; (*) indicates statistically significance differences p ≤ 0.05; (**) p ≤ 0.01 (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kühn N., Ormeño-Nuñez J., Jaque-Zamora G., Pérez F.J. Photoperiod modifies the diurnal expression profile of VvPHYA and VvPHYB transcripts in field-grown grapevine leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 2009;66:1172–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.01.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grant T.N.L., Gargrave J., Dami I.E. Morphological physiological, and biochemical changes in Vitis genotype in responses to photoperiod regimes. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2013;64:466–475. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13060. - DOI
    1. Cragin J., Serpe M., Keller M., Shellie K. Dormancy and cold hardiness transition in wine grape cultivars Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2017;68:195–202. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2016.16078. - DOI
    1. Lang G.A. Dormancy: A new universal terminology. HortScience. 1987;22:817–820.
    1. Or E., Belausov E., Popilevski I., Tal Y.B. Changes in endogenous ABA level in relation to the dormancy cycle in grapevines grown in a hot climate. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2000;75:190–194. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2000.11511221. - DOI

Grants and funding