Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 29;18(11):5839.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115839.

Why a New Research Agenda on Green Spaces and Health Is Needed in Latin America: Results of a Systematic Review

Affiliations

Why a New Research Agenda on Green Spaces and Health Is Needed in Latin America: Results of a Systematic Review

David Rojas-Rueda et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

(1) Background: Increasing and improving green spaces have been suggested to enhance health and well-being through different mechanisms. Latin America is experiencing fast population and urbanization growth; with rising demand for interventions to improve public health and mitigate climate change. (2) Aim: This study aimed to review the epidemiological evidence on green spaces and health outcomes in Latin America. (3) Methods: A systematic literature review of green spaces and health outcomes was carried out for studies published in Latin America before 28 September 2020. A search strategy was designed to identify studies published in Medline via PubMed and LILACS. The search strategy included terms related to green spaces combined with keywords related to health and geographical location. No time limit for the publication was chosen. The search was limited to English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French published articles and humans' studies. (4) Findings: This systematic review found 19 epidemiological studies in Latin America related to green spaces and health outcomes. Nine studies were conducted in Brazil, six in Mexico, three in Colombia, and one in Chile. In terms of study design, 14 were cross-sectional studies, 3 ecological, and 2 cohort studies. The population included among the studies ranged from 120 persons to 103 million. The green space definition used among studies was green density or proximity (eight studies), green presence (five studies), green spaces index (four studies), and green space visit (two studies). The health outcomes included were mental health (six studies), overweight and obesity (three studies), quality of life (three studies), mortality (two studies), cardiorespiratory disease (one study), disability (one study), falls (one study), and life expectancy (one study). Eleven studies found a positive association between green spaces and health, and eight studies found no association. (5) Conclusion: This systematic review identified 19 epidemiological studies associating green spaces and health outcomes in Latin America. Most of the evidence suggests a positive association between green spaces and health in the region. However, most of the evidence was supported by cross-sectional studies. Prioritizing longitudinal studies with harmonized exposure and outcome definitions and including vulnerable and susceptible populations is needed in the region.

Keywords: Latin-America; epidemiology; green spaces; health; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no competing financial interests. Authors hold sole responsibility for the views expressed in the manuscript, which may not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of PAHO.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the selection process of epidemiological studies on green spaces and health outcomes in Latin America (end-date of search 28 September 2020).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of the studies characteristics and findings.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Riojas-Rodríguez H., da Silva A.S., Sangrador J.L.T., Moreno-Banda G.L. Air pollution management and control in Latin America and the Caribbean: Implications for climate change. Rev. Panam. Salud Pública. 2016;40:150–159. - PubMed
    1. NNaghavi M., Abajobir A.A., Abbafati C., Abbas K.M., Abd-Allah F., Abera S.F., Aboyans V., Adetokunboh O., Afshin A., Agrawal A., et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex specifc mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. [(accessed on 12 April 2021)];Lancet. 2017 390:1151–1210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85031727040&doi=10.1.... - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nieuwenhuijsen M.J. Urban and transport planning, environmental exposures and health-new concepts, methods and tools to improve health in cities. Environ. Health. 2016;15:161–171. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0108-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watts N., Amann M., Arnell N., Ayeb-Karlsson S., Belesova K., Boykoff M., Byass P., Cai W., Campbell-Lendrum D., Capstick S., et al. The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. Lancet. 2019;394:1836–1878. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Egorov A.I., Mudu P., Braubach M., Martuzzi M. Urban Green Spaces and Health: A Review of the Evidence. World Health Organization; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2016.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources