Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 29;11(6):1610.
doi: 10.3390/ani11061610.

A Case Study on the Behavioural Effect of Positive Reinforcement Training in a Novel Task Participation Test in Göttingen Mini Pigs

Affiliations

A Case Study on the Behavioural Effect of Positive Reinforcement Training in a Novel Task Participation Test in Göttingen Mini Pigs

Lisa Jønholt et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

In laboratory animal research, many procedures will be stressful for the animals, as they are forced to participate. Training animals to cooperate using clicker training (CT) or luring (LU) may reduce stress levels, and thereby increase animal welfare. In zoo animals, aquarium animals, and pets, CT is used to train animals to cooperate during medical procedures, whereas in experimental research, LU seem to be the preferred training method. This descriptive case study aims to present the behaviour of CT and LU pigs in a potentially fear-evoking behavioural test-the novel task participation test-in which the pigs walked a short runway on a novel walking surface. All eight pigs voluntarily participated, and only one LU pig showed body stretching combined with lack of tail wagging indicating reduced welfare. All CT pigs and one LU pig displayed tail wagging during the test, indicating a positive mental state. Hence, training pigs to cooperate during experimental procedures resulted in a smooth completion of the task with no signs of fear or anxiety in seven out of eight animals. We suggest that training laboratory pigs prior to experimental procedures or tests should be done to ensure low stress levels.

Keywords: clicker training; laboratory pigs; positive reinforcement training; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variables assessed during the task (i.e., walking across the three plastic-coated plastic turf mats). Each individual pig is presented. Median and IQR (interquartile range) is shown on all four figures. (a) The time (seconds) it took each pig to complete the task. (b) The number of reinforcers the trainer used during the task. (c) Tail wagging during the task shown as percent of time spent tail wagging. (d). Body stretching. The number of body stretches shown by each pig during the task is shown. LU: luring, CT: Clicker training.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bailey J. Does the Stress of Laboratory Life and Experimentation on Animals Adversely Affect Research Data? A Critical Review. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 2018;46:291–305. doi: 10.1177/026119291804600501. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaskill B.N., Garner J.P. Stressed out: Providing laboratory animals with behavioral control to reduce the physiological effects of stress. Lab. Anim. 2017;46:142–145. doi: 10.1038/laban.1218. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poole T. Happy animals make good science. Lab. Anim. 1997;31:116–124. doi: 10.1258/002367797780600198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olsson I.A.S., Nevison C.M., Patterson-Kane E.G., Sherwin C.M., Van de Weerd H.A., Wurbel H. Understanding behaviour: The relevance of ethological approaches in laboratory animal science. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;81:245–264. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00285-X. - DOI
    1. Lambeth S.P., Hau J., Perlman J.E., Martino M., Schapiro S.J. Positive reinforcement training affects hematologic and serum chemistry values in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Am. J. Primatol. 2006;68:245–256. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20148. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources