Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 29;18(11):5851.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115851.

The Bibliometric Literature on Scopus and WoS: The Medicine and Environmental Sciences Categories as Case of Study

Mila Cascajares  1 , Alfredo Alcayde  1 , Esther Salmerón-Manzano  2 , Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro  1
Affiliations

The Bibliometric Literature on Scopus and WoS: The Medicine and Environmental Sciences Categories as Case of Study

Mila Cascajares et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

In a broad sense, science can be understood as the knowledge contained in scientific manuscripts published in scientific journals. Scientific databases index only those journals that reach certain quality standards. Therefore, research and dissemination of scientific knowledge are essential activities for the growth of science itself. The aim of this manuscript is to assess the situation of medicine and environmental sciences among the bibliometric literature and to put it in perspective with the overall bibliometric publications in all scientific fields. The main countries publishing bibliometric manuscripts are China, USA and Spain. The latter country is ranked three out of the top five institutions according to the Scopus and WoS databases. In both databases, the average scientific collaboration of the top 20 institutions offers the same result, 41%. According to Scopus, the main subject categories in which this research falls are social sciences (38%), computer science (26%) and medicine (23%), while the environmental sciences category has 8%. In the analysis of the Medicine category alone, it has been observed that 136 countries have contributions in this field. The main countries are the United States, China and the United Kingdom. In the field of medicine, the main areas studied were: Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Orthopedics, Cardiology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, Ophthalmology, Oncology, Plastic Surgery and Psychiatry. With respect to environmental sciences, less international dissemination has been found, with only 83 countries having worked in this field. The main ones are China, Spain and the United States. Regarding the top 10 institutions, it can be stated that only Spain and China are relevant. Spain focuses on sustainability and China on the environment. The result of an independent keyword analysis of all published bibliometric manuscripts has shown that the main clusters are: Mapping Science (29%), Research Productivity (23%), Medicine (20%), Environmental Sciences (12%), Psychology (7%), Nursing (6%) and Engineering (4%). In short, medicine and environmental sciences are the most relevant areas in the field of bibliometrics after social sciences and computer sciences.

Keywords: Scopus; Web of Science; bibliometry; environmental science; medicine; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methodology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bibliometric publications trend (Source Scopus).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bibliometric publications trend (Source WoS).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Worldwide distribution by country of scientific production on bibliometrics.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Subject area in Scopus and its trend from 2000 to 2020.
Figure 6
Figure 6
CNCI vs. FWCI for the top 20 journals.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Global distribution of bibliometric publications by country in the medicine category.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Global distribution of bibliometric publications by country in the environmental sciences category.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Scientific communities of bibliometric publications.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cole F.J., Eales N.B. The history of comparative anatomy: Part I—A statistical analysis of the literature. Sci. Prog. 1917;11:578–596.
    1. Lotka A.J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 1926;16:317–323.
    1. Price D.J. Little Science, Big Science. Columbia Univ. Press; New York, NY, USA: 1963.
    1. Gross P.L., Gross E.M. College libraries and chemical education. Science. 1927;66:385–389. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1713.385. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradford S.C. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering. 1934;137:85–86.

LinkOut - more resources