Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 24;8(6):440.
doi: 10.3390/children8060440.

The Effect of a 10-Week Physical Activity Programme on Fundamental Movement Skills in 3-4-Year-Old Children within Early Childhood Education Centres

Affiliations

The Effect of a 10-Week Physical Activity Programme on Fundamental Movement Skills in 3-4-Year-Old Children within Early Childhood Education Centres

Ajmol Ali et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a 10-week physical activity (PA) programme, in early childhood education (ECE) settings, on 3 and 4-year-old children's fundamental movement skills (FMS). A further aim was to examine FMS three-months post-intervention. The PA instructors delivered one 45 min session/week over 10 weeks, to 3- and 4-year-old children (n = 46), across four ECE centres. These sessions involved participation from ECE teachers. Children in the control group (CON; n = 20) received no PA classes and completed pre- and post-intervention assessments only. Locomotor (e.g., running/hopping) and object-control (e.g., kicking/throwing) skills were assessed using the Test for Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2), before and after the intervention and, for the intervention group (EXP), at 3 months. Locomotor and object-control skills significantly improved in the EXP group, with typically no change in the CON group. The EXP group's locomotor and object-control skills were maintained at 3 months. The 10-week PA intervention successfully improved 3- and 4-year-old children's FMS.

Keywords: motor skills; physical activity; physical education; pre-school; test of gross motor development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The primary author is a director of Jumping Beans Ltd. There is no conflict of interest for all other authors and no competing financial interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) locomotor skill standard scores pre-and post-intervention in (A) Control (n = 20) and (B) Experimental (n = 46) groups. * Significantly higher than baseline (p < 0.05). # significantly higher than control group (p < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) object control skill standard scores pre- and post-intervention in (A) Control (n = 20) and (B) Experimental (n = 46) groups. * Significantly higher than baseline (p < 0.05). # significantly higher than control group (p < 0.05).

References

    1. Peters M.A. Children in Crisis: The New Zealand case. Educ. Philos. Theory. 2012;45:1–5. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2012.755756. - DOI
    1. OECD Doing Better for Children. [(accessed on 12 January 2019)];2009 Available online: http://www.oecd.org/social/familiesandchildren/doingbetterforchildren.htm.
    1. Adamson P. Child Well-Being in Rich Countries: A Comparative Overview. UNICEF Office of Research; Florence, Italy: 2013.
    1. Gunner K.B., Atkinson P.M., Nichols J., Eissa M.A. Health promotion strategies to encourage physical activity in infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. J. Pediatr. Health Care. 2005;19:253–258. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.05.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Health . New Zealand Health Survey: Annual Update of Key Findings 2012/13. Ministry of Health; Wellington, New Zealand: 2013.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources