Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;50(4):1713-1728.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01903-8. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Infection in Cisgender and Transgender Women in the U.S.: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Aleta Baldwin  1 , Brenda Light  2 , Waridibo E Allison  3
Affiliations
Review

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Infection in Cisgender and Transgender Women in the U.S.: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Aleta Baldwin et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May.

Abstract

Using a socioecological approach, this review describes the peer-reviewed literature on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among both cisgender (cis women) and transgender women (trans women) in the U.S. A search of the PubMed database and HIV-related conference abstracts generated over 2,200 articles and abstracts. Of these, 103 fulfilled review inclusion criteria. Most of the existing research presents findings on individual-level factors associated with PrEP use such as willingness and perceived barriers. There was far less investigation of factors related to PrEP at more distal ecological levels. Though trans women are at greater risk of HIV infection than cisgender women, less is known about this population group with respect to PrEP despite their inclusion in many major clinical trials. Further, the literature is characterized by a persistent conflation of sex and gender which makes it difficult to accurately assess the reviewed research on HIV prevention and PrEP apart from risk group. Informed by these findings, we highlight specific opportunities to improve access to PrEP and reduce socioecological barriers to PrEP care engagement for cisgender and transgender women.

Keywords: Cisgender women; Gender; HIV prevention; PrEP; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; Transgender women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Modified PRISMA Flow Diagram of studies included in systematic review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Amico KR, Marcus JL, McMahan V, Liu A, Koester KA, Goicochea P, Grant RM. Study product adherence measurement in the iPrEx placebo-controlled trial: Concordance with drug detection. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2014;66(5):530–537. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000216. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amico KR, Mehrotra M, Avelino-Silva VI, McMahan V, Veloso VG, Anderson P, iPrEx Study Team Self-reported recent PrEP dosing and drug detection in an open label PrEP study. AIDS and Behavior. 2016;20(7):1535–1540. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1360-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auerbach, J., Banyan, A., & Riordan, M. (2012). Will and should women in the U.S. use PrEP? Findings from a focus group study of at-risk, HIV-negative women in Oakland, Memphis, San Diego, and Washington, DC. Paper presented at the International AIDS Conference, Washington, DC.
    1. Auerbach JD, Kinsky S, Brown G, Charles V. Knowledge, attitudes, and likelihood of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among US women at risk of acquiring HIV. AIDS Patient Care and STDS. 2015;29(2):102–110. doi: 10.1089/apc.2014.0142. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey JL, Molino ST, Vega AD, Badowski M. A review of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: The female perspective. Infectious Diseases and Therapy. 2017;6(3):363–382. doi: 10.1007/s40121-017-0159-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances