Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;45(1):119-124.
doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01569-3. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

Microsurgical suturing assessment scores: a systematic review

Niveditha M  1 , Ravi Sharma  1 , Ashish Suri  2
Affiliations

Microsurgical suturing assessment scores: a systematic review

Niveditha M et al. Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Several scoring scales for the assessment of microsurgical skills have been established and validated with the same basic parameters. The study aims to review the existing scales to highlight those parameters, which can be utilized uniformly across all neurosurgical training centers. An online search was conducted and all the surgical scores pertinent to microsurgical suturing were reviewed. The scales were compared to identify parameters, which were important for skill development and assessment in neurosurgical trainees. Seven assessment scales were identified which assessed the trainee's proficiency in microsurgical suturing. The objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and Northwestern Objective Microanastomosis Assessment Tool (NOMAT) were identified as the most widely used and validated assessment scales. The newer scales University of Western Ontario microsurgical skills acquisition/assessment (UWOMSA) and structured assessment of microsurgery (SAMS) were notable for the division of the skills. The knot strength, suture separation, and suture intervals were the most important parameters in all scales. Each scale has its strength in the assessment of the microsurgical proficiency of neurosurgical trainees. However, a more uniform scale that can be applied as per the level of the neurosurgical trainee is necessary.

Keywords: Microsurgery; Microsuturing; Neurosurgery; Simulation; Skills; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Aoun SG, El Ahmadieh TY, El Tecle NE, Daou MR, Adel JG, Park CS, Batjer HH, Bendok BR (2015) A pilot study to assess the construct and face validity of the Northwestern Objective Microanastomosis Assessment Tool. J Neurosurg 123(1):103–109. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS131814 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atkins JL, Kalu PU, Lannon DA, Green CJ, Butler PE (2005) Training in microsurgical skills: does course-based learning deliver? Microsurgery 25:481–485 - DOI
    1. Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, MS. Lewis-Beckeded. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks - DOI
    1. Chan W, Niranjan N, Ramakrishnan V (2010) Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(8):1329–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.06.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan WY, Figus A, Ekwobi C, Srinivasan JR, Ramakrishnan VV (2010) The ‘round the clock’ training model for assessment and warm-up of microsurgical skills: a validation study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(8):1323–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.06.027 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources