Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;49(7):2959-2971.
doi: 10.1002/jcop.22620. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

Resident and house manager perceptions of social environments in sober living houses: Associations with length of stay

Elizabeth Mahoney  1 , Jane Witbrodt  2 , Amy A Mericle  2 , Douglas L Polcin  1
Affiliations

Resident and house manager perceptions of social environments in sober living houses: Associations with length of stay

Elizabeth Mahoney et al. J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Aims: Studies have shown persons living in recovery homes for drug and alcohol problems make significant, sustained improvements. However, there is limited information about factors associated with outcomes. This study examined how perceptions of social environment of one type of recovery home, sober living houses (SLHs), were associated with length of stay (LOS).

Methods: SLH residents and their house managers (N = 416) completed the recovery home environment scale (RHES) that assessed social model recovery characteristics and the community-oriented program evaluation scale (CPES) that evaluated perceptions of the program environment.

Results: Scales completed by residents predicted LOS, but those completed by house managers did not. Larger discrepancies between the two groups were associated with shorter LOS. The RHES was shown to be a stronger predictor of LOS than the CPES.

Conclusion: Results highlight the importance of the social environment in SLHs, particularly those most closely aligned with social model recovery principles.

Keywords: length of stay; perceptions; program Evaluation; recovery homes; sober living house; social environment; substance-related disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosure: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bergman BG, Hoeppner BB, Nelson LM, Slaymaker V and Kelly JF (2015) The Effects of Continuing Care on Emerging Adult Outcomes Following Residential Addiction Treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 153, 207–214. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borkman TJ, Kaskutas LA, & Barrows DC (1996). The social model program: a literature review and history (Contract No. 270–94-0001). Retrieved from Rockville, MD:
    1. Borkman TJ, Kaskutas LA, Room J, Bryan K, & Barrows D (1998). An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 15(1), 7–17. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00244-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harvey R, & Jason LA (2011). Contrasting social climates of small peer-run versus a larger staff-run substance abuse recovery setting. American journal of community psychology, 48(3–4), 365–372. doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9432-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jason LA, Guerrero M, Salomon-Amend M, Light JM, & Stoolmiller M (2021). Personal and environmental social capital predictors of relapse following departure from recovery homes. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2020.1856787 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types