Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;17(4):e13216.
doi: 10.1111/mcn.13216. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

The impact of Baby Friendly Initiative accreditation: An overview of systematic reviews

Frankie J Fair  1 , Alison Morrison  1 , Hora Soltani  1
Affiliations
Review

The impact of Baby Friendly Initiative accreditation: An overview of systematic reviews

Frankie J Fair et al. Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Despite its reported benefits, breastfeeding rates are low globally, and support systems such as the Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) have been established to support healthy infant feeding practices and infant bonding. Increasingly reviews are being undertaken to assess the overall impact of BFI accreditation. A systematic synthesis of current reviews has therefore been carried out to examine the state of literature on the effects of BFI accreditation. A systematic search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, Maternal and Infant Health, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and PROSPERO was undertaken. Study selection, data extraction and critical appraisal of included reviews using the AMSTAR-2 tool were undertaken by two authors, with disagreements resolved through discussion with the third author. Due to heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis of findings was applied. Fourteen reviews met the inclusion criteria. Overall confidence in the results of the review was rated as high for three reviews, low for two reviews and critically low for nine reviews. Most evidence suggests some increase in breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity and duration of breastfeeding, and one main trial suggests decreased gastrointestinal infection and allergic dermatitis in infants. However, overall certainty in the evidence was rated as very low across all outcomes due to concerns over risk of bias within and heterogeneity between the original studies. More contemporary, good-quality randomised controlled trials or well-controlled prospective comparative cohorts are required to better evaluate the impact of full BFI accreditation, with particular attention paid to the context of the research and to long-term maternal and infant health outcomes.

Keywords: baby friendly initiative; breast feeding; breast milk; overview of reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Risk of bias and study design as assessed by review author(s) of the 105 individual studies included within the reviews. †One prospective cohort was non‐comparative
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Allen, J. A., Longenecker, H. B., Perrine, C. G., & Scanlon, K. S. (2013). Baby‐friendly hospital practices and birth costs. Birth, 40(4), 221–226. 10.1111/birt.12062 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C., Holly, C., Khalil, H., & Tungpunkom, P. (2014). Methodology for JBI umbrella reviews. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual. Supplement (pp. 1–34). Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute.
    1. Aryeetey, R., & Dykes, F. (2018). Global implications of the new WHO and UNICEF implementation guidance on the revised Baby‐Friendly Hospital Initiative. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 14(3), e12637. 10.1111/mcn.12637 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atchan, M., Davis, D., & Foureur, M. (2013). The impact of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in the Australian health care system: A critical narrative review of the evidence. Breastfeeding Review: Professional Publication of the Nursing Mothers' Association of Australia, 21(2), 15–22. - PubMed
    1. Beake, S., Pellowe, C., Dykes, F., Schmied, V., & Bick, D. (2011). A systematic review of structured versus non‐structured breastfeeding programmes to support the initiation and duration of exclusive breastfeeding in acute and primary healthcare settings. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, 9(36), 1471–1508. 10.11124/jbisrir-2011-121 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types