New perspectives for evaluating relative risks of African swine fever virus contamination in global feed ingredient supply chains
- PMID: 34076354
- DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14174
New perspectives for evaluating relative risks of African swine fever virus contamination in global feed ingredient supply chains
Abstract
There are no published reports indicating that the African swine fever virus (ASFV) has been detected in feed ingredients or complete feed. This is primarily because there are only a few laboratories in the world that have the biosecurity and analytical capabilities of detecting ASFV in feed. Several in vitro studies have been conducted to evaluate ASFV concentration, viability and inactivation when ASFV was added to various feed ingredients and complete feed. These inoculation studies have shown that some feed matrices support virus survival longer than others and the reasons for this are unknown. Current analytical methodologies have significant limitations in sensitivity, repeatability, ability to detect viable virus particles and association with infectivity. As a result, interpretation of findings using various measures may lead to misleading conclusions. Because of analytical and technical challenges, as well as the lack of ASFV contamination data in feed supply chains, quantitative risk assessments have not been conducted. A few qualitative risk assessments have been conducted, but they have not considered differences in potential scenarios for ASFV contamination between various types of feed ingredient supply chains. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to provide a more holistic understanding of the relative potential risks of ASFV contamination in various global feed ingredient supply chains and provide recommendations for addressing the challenges identified.
Keywords: African swine fever virus; animal by-products; biosecurity; crystalline amino acids; feed additives; feed fraud; minerals; soybean products; virus inactivation; vitamins.
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Similar articles
-
Biosecurity and Mitigation Strategies to Control Swine Viruses in Feed Ingredients and Complete Feeds.Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;13(14):2375. doi: 10.3390/ani13142375. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37508151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rethinking the uncertainty of African swine fever virus contamination in feed ingredients and risk of introduction into the United States.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Jan;69(1):157-175. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14358. Epub 2021 Nov 8. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022. PMID: 34689419
-
An analysis of select swine feed ingredients and pork products imported into the United States from African swine fever virus affected countries.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Jan;69(1):128-136. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14265. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022. PMID: 34328692
-
Half-Life of African Swine Fever Virus in Shipped Feed.Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;25(12):2261-2263. doi: 10.3201/eid2512.191002. Epub 2019 Dec 17. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 31524583 Free PMC article.
-
Potential routes for indirect transmission of African swine fever virus into domestic pig herds.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020 Jul;67(4):1472-1484. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13538. Epub 2020 Mar 23. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020. PMID: 32150785 Review.
Cited by
-
Mitigation Strategies for African Swine Fever Virus Biosecurity: From Virus Inactivation to Pig Health.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025 Jun 23;2025:7162567. doi: 10.1155/tbed/7162567. eCollection 2025. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025. PMID: 40589876 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Survival of a surrogate African swine fever virus-like algal virus in feed matrices using a 23-day commercial United States truck transport model.Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec 9;13:1059118. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1059118. eCollection 2022. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 36569067 Free PMC article.
-
Biosecurity and Mitigation Strategies to Control Swine Viruses in Feed Ingredients and Complete Feeds.Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;13(14):2375. doi: 10.3390/ani13142375. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37508151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inactivation of African swine fever virus inoculated in liquid plasma by spray drying and storage for 14 days at 4°C or 20°C.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 22;18(8):e0290395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290395. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37607204 Free PMC article.
-
Areas within the United States at the Highest Risk for African Swine Fever, Classical Swine Fever, and Foot-and-Mouth Disease Introduction.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023 May 25;2023:8892037. doi: 10.1155/2023/8892037. eCollection 2023. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023. PMID: 40303669 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alao, B. O., Falowo, A. B., Chulayo, A., & Muchenje, V. (2017). The potential of animal by-products in food systems: Production, prospects, and challenges. Sustainability, 9(7), 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071089
-
- Almeida, F. N., Htoo, J. K., Thomson, J., & Stein, H. H. (2013). Amino acid digestibility of heat damaged distillers dried grains with solubles fed to pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 4, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-44
-
- Alonso, C., Borca, M., Dixon, L., Revilla, Y., Rodriguez, F., & Escribano, J. M., & ICTV Report Consortium. (2018). ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Asfarviridae. Journal of General Virology, 99(5), 613-614. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001049
-
- Animal Nutrition Association of Canada. (2018). National biosecurity guide for the livestock and poultry feed sector. https://www.anacan.org/files/ANACGuidanceandReports/ANAC-Biosecurity-Gui...
-
- Auvermann, B., Kalbasi, A., & Ahmed, A. (2004, August). Rendering. In Carcass disposal: A comprehensive review (pp. 21-25). National Agricultural Biosecurity Center Consortium Carcass Disposal Working Group. https://amarillo.tamu.edu/files/2011/01/draftreport.pdf
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials