3D analysis of bone mineral density in a cohort: age- and sex-related differences
- PMID: 34076788
- DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00921-w
3D analysis of bone mineral density in a cohort: age- and sex-related differences
Abstract
Women have lower areal BMD (g/cm2) than men; however, the women have smaller-size bones. Our study showed that women ≤ 59 years have a hip volumetric BMD by DXA 3D similar to that of men of the same age. This makes us think about the importance of taking into account bone size at the time of analyzing the sex-related differences in bone mass.
Purpose: Women have lower areal BMD (g/cm2) than men; however, these studies do not take into account that women have smaller-size bones. Recently, three-dimensional (3D) modeling methods were proposed to analyze volumetric BMD (vBMD). We want to determine the values of vBMD at the hip by DXA-based 3D modeling in a cohort of people in order to know the age- and sex-related differences.
Methods: A total of 2647 people of both sexes (65% women) were recruited from a large cohort (Camargo cohort, Santander, Spain). 3D-SHAPER® software (version 2.8, Galgo Medical, Barcelona, Spain) was used to derive 3D analysis from the hip DXA scans at baseline RESULTS: The differences were less pronounced for vBMD (cortical sBMD 9.3%, trabecular vBMD 6.4%, integral vBMD 2.2%) compared to aBMD (FN aBMD 11.4% and TH aBMD 13.3%). After stratifying by age (≤ 59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and ≥ 80 years), we observed in ≤ 59 years that aBMD was lower in women compared to men, at FN (0.758 [0.114] g/cm2 vs. 0.833 [0.117] g/cm2; p = 1.4 × 10-20) and TH (0.878 [0.117] g/cm2 vs. 0.990 [0.119] g/cm2; p = 4.1 × 10-40). Nevertheless, no statistically significant difference was observed for integral vBMD (331 [58] mg/cm3 in women and 326 [51] mg/cm3 in men; p = 0.19) and trabecular vBMD (190 [41] mg/cm3 in women and 195 [39] mg/cm3 in men; p = 0.20).
Conclusion: Our results make us think about the importance of taking into account bone size at the time of analyzing the sex-related differences in bone mass.
Keywords: 3D; Bone mineral density; Cortical; Sex; Trabecular.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of volumetric BMD in people with Down syndrome using DXA-based 3D modeling.Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Sep 7;14(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0645-7. Arch Osteoporos. 2019. PMID: 31494745
-
3D-modeling from hip DXA shows improved bone structure with romosozumab followed by denosumab or alendronate.J Bone Miner Res. 2024 May 2;39(4):473-483. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae028. J Bone Miner Res. 2024. PMID: 38477808 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Analysis of Bone Impairment by 3D DXA Hip Measures in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Pilot Study.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jan 1;105(1):dgz060. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz060. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020. PMID: 31588503
-
Association between osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and DXA-derived 3D measurements at lumbar spine: a case-control study.Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Jan 3;15(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0680-4. Arch Osteoporos. 2020. PMID: 31897775
-
Volumetric BMD by 3D-DXA and Trabecular Bone Score in Adults With Down Syndrome.J Clin Densitom. 2021 Oct-Dec;24(4):630-637. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 30. J Clin Densitom. 2021. PMID: 33618949 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the horizontal approach to the medial malleolar facet in sagittal talar fractures through dorsiflexion and plantarflexion positions.PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0295350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295350. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38748674 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure bone mineral density (BMD) for diagnosis of osteoporosis - experimental data from artificial vertebrae confirms significant dependence on bone size.Bone Rep. 2022 Jul 25;17:101607. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101607. eCollection 2022 Dec. Bone Rep. 2022. PMID: 35937936 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis (1994) Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129
-
- Cawthon PM (2011) Gender differences in osteoporosis and fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1900–1905 - DOI
-
- Fujiwara S (2003) Epidemiology of osteoporosis: gender differences. Clin Calcium 13:1385–1390 - PubMed
-
- Riancho JA, Valero C, Hernandez JL, Olmos JM, Paule B, Zarrabeitia A, Gonzalez-Macias J (2007) Biomechanical indices of the femoral neck estimated from the standard DXA output: age- and sex-related differences. J Clin Densitom 10:39–45 - DOI
-
- Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R (1992) New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137–145 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous