Mechanical interaction between additive-manufactured metal lattice structures and bone in compression: implications for stress shielding of orthopaedic implants
- PMID: 34077904
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104608
Mechanical interaction between additive-manufactured metal lattice structures and bone in compression: implications for stress shielding of orthopaedic implants
Abstract
One of the main biomechanical causes for aseptic failure of orthopaedic implants is the stress shielding. This is caused by an uneven load distribution across the bone normally due to a stiff metal prosthesis component, leading to periprosthetic bone resorption and to implant loosening. To reduce the stress shielding and to improve osseointegration, biocompatible porous structures suitable for orthopaedic applications have been developed. Aim of this study was to propose a novel in-vitro model of the mechanical interaction between metal lattice structures and bovine cortical bone in compression. Analysis of the strain distribution between metal structure and bone provides useful information on the potential stress shielding of orthopaedic implants with the same geometry of the porous scaffold. Full density and lattice structures obtained by the repetition of 1.5 mm edge cubic elements via Laser Powder Bed Fusion of CoCrMo powder were characterized for mechanical properties using standard compressive testing. The two porous geometries were characterized by 750 μm and 1000 μm pores resulting in a nominal porosity of 43.5% and 63.2% respectively. Local deformation and strains of metal samples coupled with fresh bovine cortical bone samples were evaluated via Digital Image Correlation analysis up to failure in compression. Visualization and quantification of the local strain gradient across the metal-bone interface was used to assess differences in mechanical behaviour between structures which could be associated to stress-shielding. Overall stiffness and local mechanical properties of lattice and bone were consistent across samples. Full-density metal samples appeared to rigidly transfer the compression force to the bone which was subjected to large deformations (2.2 ± 0.3% at 15 kN). Larger porosity lattice was associated to lower stiffness and compressive modulus, and to a smoother load transfer to the bone. While tested on a limited sample size, the proposed in-vitro model appears robust and repeatable to assess the local mechanical interaction of metal samples suitable for orthopaedic applications with the bone tissue. CoCrMo scaffolds made of 1000 μm pores cubic cells may allow for a smoother load transfer to the bone when used as constitutive material of orthopaedic implants.
Keywords: Additive manufacturing; In-vitro model; Lattice structures; Orthopedics; Stress-shielding; Stress/strain measurements.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
An integrated experimental and analytical approach for the analysis of the mechanical interaction between metal porous scaffolds and bone: implications for stress shielding in orthopedic implants.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 9;13:1562367. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1562367. eCollection 2025. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025. PMID: 40271346 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Apr;80:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.017. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018. PMID: 29414477 Free PMC article.
-
Design and manufacturing of patient-specific Ti6Al4V implants with inhomogeneous porosity.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Jul;143:105925. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105925. Epub 2023 May 20. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023. PMID: 37244075
-
Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review.Biomaterials. 2016 Mar;83:127-41. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 6. Biomaterials. 2016. PMID: 26773669 Review.
-
Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: a systematic review.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 16;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03492-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36647070 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Biodegradable Polyurethanes for Tissue Engineering: Influence of L-Lactide Content on Degradation and Mechanical Properties.Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;17(12):1685. doi: 10.3390/polym17121685. Polymers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40574212 Free PMC article.
-
Hybrid Ti6Al4V/Silk Fibroin Composite for Load-Bearing Implants: A Hierarchical Multifunctional Cellular Scaffold.Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 5;15(17):6156. doi: 10.3390/ma15176156. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36079541 Free PMC article.
-
Porous metal materials for applications in orthopedic field: A review on mechanisms in bone healing.J Orthop Translat. 2024 Oct 11;49:135-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.003. eCollection 2024 Nov. J Orthop Translat. 2024. PMID: 40226784 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Porosity on Tribological Properties of Medical-Grade 316L Stainless Steel Manufactured by Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion.Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 26;18(3):568. doi: 10.3390/ma18030568. Materials (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39942234 Free PMC article.
-
Application and progress of 3D printed biomaterials in osteoporosis.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Feb 4;13:1541746. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1541746. eCollection 2025. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025. PMID: 39968010 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources