Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality
- PMID: 3407813
- PMCID: PMC1349387
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.9.1170
Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality
Abstract
Data from the 1980 National Natality Survey by the National Center for Health Statistics were used to assess the relation of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) during labor with cesarean section rates and neonatal morbidity and mortality. In univariate analyses, EFM was associated with higher cesarean section rates, lower five-minute Apgar scores, and a higher rate of respiratory distress. Logistic regression analysis controlling for other risk factors for poor neonatal outcome indicated that the association of EFM with higher cesarean section rates persisted (odds ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.16, 1.81), except in certain pregnancies at very high risk for cesarean section. EFM was associated with an Apgar score less than 6 at five minutes only if delivery was by cesarean section. EFM was not found to be independently associated with respiratory distress. Neither univariate nor multivariate analyses found an association of EFM with neonatal mortality. These results suggest that EFM may identify hypoxic infants, who are frequently delivered by cesarean section. The lack of association of EFM with beneficial neonatal outcomes is consistent either with lack of effect of EFM or with uncontrolled selection bias.
Similar articles
-
Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00120.x. Birth. 2006. PMID: 17150066
-
Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980.Public Health Rep. 1984 Mar-Apr;99(2):173-83. Public Health Rep. 1984. PMID: 6424166 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):899-907. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8497353 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update.Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Oct;86(4 Pt 1):613-20. Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7675390 Review.
-
Electronic Fetal Monitoring and Cesarean Birth: A Scoping Review.Birth. 2016 Dec;43(4):277-284. doi: 10.1111/birt.12247. Epub 2016 Aug 27. Birth. 2016. PMID: 27565450
Cited by
-
Strengthening Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring during Labor with a Standard Handheld Doppler - Implementation Experience from India.Indian J Community Med. 2022 Jul-Sep;47(3):405-409. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_818_21. Epub 2022 Oct 10. Indian J Community Med. 2022. PMID: 36438535 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring to predict acidemia at birth with the use of deep learning.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan;232(1):116.e1-116.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.022. Epub 2024 Apr 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 38663662
-
A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):523.e1-523.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.026. Epub 2018 Feb 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29408586 Free PMC article.
-
The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.Health Serv Res. 1991 Aug;26(3):325-37. Health Serv Res. 1991. PMID: 1869443 Free PMC article.
-
Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries.BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):e042076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042076. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33509847 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical