Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):285.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03300-4.

Family involvement practices for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a cross-sectional fidelity-based study

Affiliations

Family involvement practices for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a cross-sectional fidelity-based study

Lars Hestmark et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders is supported by scientific evidence, as well as legal and ethical considerations, and recommended in clinical practice guidelines. This article reports a cross-sectional measurement of the level of implementation of such guidelines in fifteen community mental health centre units in Norway, and presents a novel fidelity scale to measure basic family involvement and support. The aim was to investigate current family involvement practices comprehensively, as a basis for targeted quality improvement.

Methods: We employed three fidelity scales, with 12-14 items, to measure family involvement practices. Items were scored from 1 to 5, where 1 equals no implementation and 5 equals full implementation. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, a non-parametric test, and calculation of interrater reliability for the scales.

Results: The mean score was 2.33 on the fidelity scale measuring basic family involvement and support. Among patients with psychotic disorders, only 4% had received family psychoeducation. On the family psychoeducation fidelity assessment scale, measuring practice and content, the mean score was 2.78. Among the eight units who offered family psychoeducation, it was 4.34. On the general organizational index scale, measuring the organisation and implementation of family psychoeducation, the mean score was 1.78. Among the units who offered family psychoeducation, it was 2.46. As a measure of interrater reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.99 for the basic family involvement and support scale, 0.93 for the family psychoeducation fidelity assessment scale and 0.96 for the general organizational index scale.

Conclusions: The implementation level of the national guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders was generally poor. The quality of family psychoeducation was high, but few patients had received this evidence-based treatment. Our novel fidelity scale shows promising psychometric properties and may prove a useful tool to improve the quality of health services. There is a need to increase the implementation of family involvement practices in Norway, to reach a larger percentage of patients and relatives.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177 . Registered 11.03.19.

Keywords: Family involvement; Family psychoeducation; Fidelity scale; Implementation science; Mental health services research; Psychotic disorders; Schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - ICD-10. Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders (F20-F29): World Health Organization 2016 [Available from: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en#/F20-F29]. Accessed Feb 2021.
    1. Weimand BM, Hedelin B, Hall-Lord ML, Sällström C. “Left alone with straining but inescapable responsibilities:” relatives’ experiences with mental health services. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2011;32(11):703–710. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2011.598606. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vermeulen B, Lauwers H, Spruytte N, Van Audenhove C, Magro C, Saunders J, Jones K. Experiences of family caregivers for persons with severe mental illness: an international exploration. Leuven: LUCAS KU Leuven/EUFAMI; 2015.
    1. Bucci S, Berry K, Barrowclough C, Haddock G. Family interventions in psychosis: a review of the evidence and barriers to implementation. Aust Psychol. 2016;51(1):62–68. doi: 10.1111/ap.12172. - DOI
    1. Rummel-Kluge C, Pitschel-Walz G, Bauml J, Kissling W. Psychoeducation in schizophrenia--results of a survey of all psychiatric institutions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32(4):765–775. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data