Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):15.
doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00109-y.

How to objectively assess and observe maladaptive pain behaviors in clinical rehabilitation: a systematic search and review

Florian Naye  1 , Chloé Cachinho  2 , Annie-Pier Tremblay  1 , Maude Saint-Germain Lavoie  1 , Gabriel Lepage  1 , Emma Larochelle  1 , Lorijane Labrecque  1 , Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme  3   4
Affiliations
Review

How to objectively assess and observe maladaptive pain behaviors in clinical rehabilitation: a systematic search and review

Florian Naye et al. Arch Physiother. .

Abstract

Background: Cognitive-affective factors influence the perception of pain and disability. These factors can lead to pain behaviors (PB) that can persist and become maladaptive. These maladaptive PB will further increase the risk of chronicity or persistence of symptoms and disability. Thus, clinicians must be prepared to recognize maladaptive PB in a clinical context. To date, in the context of assessment in a rehabilitation setting, PB in clinical settings are poorly documented. The main objective of this study was to identify direct observation methods and critically appraise them in order to propose recommendations for practice. As a secondary objective, we explored and extracted the different observable PB that patients could exhibit and that clinicians could observe.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review on four databases with a generic search strategy in order to obtain the largest range of PB. For the first objective, a two-step critical appraisal used clinical criteria (from qualitative studies on barriers to implement routine measures) and psychometric criteria (from Brink and Louw critical appraisal tool) to determine which observation methods could be recommended for clinical practice. For the second objective, we extracted PB found in the literature to list potential PB that patients could exhibit, and clinicians could observe.

Results: From the 3362 retrieved studies, 47 met the inclusion criteria for the first objective. The clinical criteria allowed us to select three observation methods. After the psychometric step, two observation methods were retained and recommended for clinical practice: the Behavioral Avoidance Test-Back Pain (BAT-Back) and the Pain Behaviour Scale (PaBS). For the second objective, 107 studies met the inclusion criteria. The extraction of the PB allowed us to list a large range of PB and classify the data in 7 categories of PB.

Conclusion: Our results allowed us to recommend two observation methods for clinical practice. However, these methods have limitations and are validated only in chronic low back pain populations. With the extraction of PB presented in the literature, we contribute to better prepare clinicians to recognize PB in all patients who are experiencing pain.

Keywords: Assessment; Avoidance behavior; Endurance behavior; Musculoskeletal pain; Pain behavior; Protective behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Martel MO, Joshi AB, Cook CE. Rehabilitation management of low back pain–it’s time to pull it all together! J Pain Res. 2017;10:2373–2385. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S146485. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foster NE, DeLitto A. Embedding psychosocial perspectives within clinical management of low back pain: integration of informed management principles into physical therapy practice - challenges and opportunities. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):790–803. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100326. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wijma AJ, van Wilgen CP, Meeus M, Nijs J. Clinical biopsychosocial physiotherapy assessment of patients with chronic pain: the first step in pain neuroscience education. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32(5):368–384. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1194651. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meints SM, Edwards RR. Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;87(Pt B):168–182. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin I, Wiles L, Waller R, Goucke R, Nagree Y, Gibberd M, et al. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2019:bjsports-2018-099878 10.1136/BJSPORTS-2018-099878. - PubMed