Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;11(6):e042266.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042266.

Monitoring of Palliative Care Symptoms and Concerns in Specialized Palliative Home Care Using an Electronic Version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (Palli-MONITOR): protocol for a mixed-methods study

Anna Bolzani  1 , Christina Ramsenthaler  2   3 , Farina Hodiamont  4 , Isabel Sophie Burner-Fritsch  4 , Claudia Bausewein  4
Affiliations

Monitoring of Palliative Care Symptoms and Concerns in Specialized Palliative Home Care Using an Electronic Version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (Palli-MONITOR): protocol for a mixed-methods study

Anna Bolzani et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Over the last decades, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been developed to better understand the patient's perspective and enable patient-centred care. In palliative care, the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is recommended as a PRO tool. Its implementation in specialised palliative home care (SPHC) would benefit from an electronic version validated for the setting.Following the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance, the study Palli-MONITOR is developing (phase 1) and testing the feasibility (phase 2) of implementing the electronic version of IPOS (eIPOS) in the SPHC setting to inform a cluster-randomised phase 3 trial.

Methods and analysis: Palli-MONITOR is a multicentre, sequential mixed-methods, two-phase development and feasibility study. The study consists of four substudies. In phase 1 (MRC development phase), qualitative patient interviews and focus groups with SPHC professionals are used to identify barriers and facilitators of eIPOS (substudy I). Substudy II tests the equivalence of eIPOS and IPOS in a crossover randomised controlled trial. Phase 2 (MRC feasibility/piloting phase) includes a quasi-experimental study with two control groups (substudy III), and qualitative interviews as well as focus groups to explore the feasibility and acceptability of the developed intervention (substudy IV).Qualitative data will be analysed with thematic analysis following the framework approach. Quantitative analysis uses a two-way intraclass correlation coefficients model for the equivalence testing. Quantitative analysis of the quasi-experimental study will focus on the primary outcomes, recruitment rates and completeness of eIPOS. Secondary outcomes will include intraindividual change in palliative symptoms and concerns, quality of life and symptom burden.

Ethics and dissemination: Approval of the ethics committee of the Ludwig Maximilian University Munich was received for all study parts. Results and experiences will be presented at congresses and in written form. Additionally, participating SPHC teams will receive summarised results.

Trial registration number: NCT03879668.

Keywords: palliative care; qualitative research; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design of the project Palli-MONITOR. eIPOS, electronic IPOS; IPOS, Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Substudy III—data collection and inclusion criteria of the quasi-experimental study. *Assessed by the clinical team. eIPOS, electronic Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale; ESAS, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale; QoL, Quality of Life; SPHC, specialised palliative home care.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA) . Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses Zur Verordnung von spezialisierter ambulanter Palliativversorgung (spezialisierte ambulante Palliativversorgungs-Richtlinie/SAPV-RL), 2007.
    1. Alt-Epping B, Nauck F. Spezialisierte Ambulante Palliativversorgung (SAPV). Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2015;58:430–5. - PubMed
    1. Groh G, Vyhnalek B, Feddersen B, et al. . Effectiveness of a specialized outpatient palliative care service as experienced by patients and caregivers. J Palliat Med 2013;16:848–56. 10.1089/jpm.2012.0491 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung . Spezialisierte Ambulante Palliativversorgung, 2017. Available: http://gesundheitsdaten.kbv.de/cms/html/16744.php
    1. Schneider W, Eschenbruch N, Thoms U, et al. . Wirksamkeit und Qualitätssicherung in Der SAPV-Praxis—Eine explorative Begleitstudie. Ergebnisbericht, 2011.

Publication types

Associated data