Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 1;38(5):402-417.
doi: 10.1089/ees.2020.0321. Epub 2021 May 24.

Global Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Approaches: Anthropological Contributions and Future Directions for Engineering

Affiliations

Global Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Approaches: Anthropological Contributions and Future Directions for Engineering

Cassandra L Workman et al. Environ Eng Sci. .

Abstract

Anthropologists contribute key insights toward a comprehensive understanding of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) as a multidimensional, multiscalar, and culturally embedded phenomenon. Yet, these insights have yet to be sufficiently operationalized and implemented in WASH development and wider WASH access-related paradigms. Ensuring WASH security requires a comprehensive approach to identifying both human health risk and environmental impact of WASH-related programs and strategies. It requires an understanding of how sanitation is integrated into households and communities and how individuals within particular cultural contexts practice sanitation and hygiene. This work facilitates that goal by outlining the major contributions of anthropology and allied social sciences to WASH, as well as outlining key considerations for future work and collaboration. We identify six major themes that, if applied in future engineering approaches, will more equitably integrate stakeholders and multiple vantage points in the successful implementation of WASH projects for marginalized and diverse groups. These include a critical understanding of previous approaches, culturally aware interventions, capacity building that considers (un)intended impact, co-created technology, collaboration between fields such as anthropology and engineering, and challenge-ready initiatives that respond to historic and emergent social and environmental inequity.

Keywords: appropriate solutions; interdisciplinary; sustainable development; transdisciplinary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Focus on six “C's” to create a more equitable WASH sector. WASH, water, sanitation, and hygiene.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1996). Writing against culture. In R.G. Fox, Ed., Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, p. 137
    1. Agar, M.H. (1996). The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (Vol. 2). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
    1. Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Dev. Change 26, 413
    1. Alley, K.D. (2002). On the Banks of the Gaṅgā: When Wastewater Meets a Sacred River. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
    1. Anand, N. (2017). Hydraulic City. Duke UP, Durham, NC, USA

LinkOut - more resources