Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Jun;11(6):2888-2892.
doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1409.

External validation of AI algorithms in breast radiology: the last healthcare security checkpoint?

Affiliations
Editorial

External validation of AI algorithms in breast radiology: the last healthcare security checkpoint?

Teodoro Martin-Noguerol et al. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-1409). Dr. AL has been lecturer for Siemens Healthineers, Philips, Canon and Bracco. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Comment on

References

    1. Helvie MA, Bevers TB. Screening mammography for average-risk women: the controversy and NCCN's position. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;16:1398-404. 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7081 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biesheuvel C, Weigel S, Heindel W. Mammography screening: evidence, history and current practice in Germany and other European countries. Breast Care (Basel) 2011;6:104-9. 10.1159/000327493 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson HD, O'Meara ES, Kerlikowske K, Balch S, Miglioretti D. Factors associated with rates of false-positive and false-negative results from digital mammography screening: an analysis of registry data. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:226-35. 10.7326/M15-0971 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giess CS, Wang A, Ip IK, Lacson R, Pourjabbar S, Khorasani R. Patient, radiologist, and examination characteristics affecting screening mammography recall rates in a large academic practice. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:411-8. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.06.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernardi D, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, Valentini M, Fantò C, Ostillio L, Tuttobene P, Luparia A, Houssami N. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:1105-13. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2 - DOI - PubMed