Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 28;7(3):e585.
doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000585. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnancies With Corpus Callosum or Posterior Fossa Anomalies

Affiliations

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnancies With Corpus Callosum or Posterior Fossa Anomalies

Lior Greenbaum et al. Neurol Genet. .

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results in pregnancies with sonographic diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum anomalies (CCA) or posterior fossa anomalies (PFA).

Methods: All CMA tests in pregnancies with CCA or PFA performed between January 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively evaluated from the Israeli Ministry of Health database. The rate of CMA with clinically significant (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) findings was calculated and compared to a local Israeli cohort of 5,541 pregnancies with normal ultrasound.

Results: One hundred eighty-two pregnancies were enrolled: 102 cases with CCA and 89 with PFA (9 cases had both). Clinically significant CMA results were found in 7/102 of CCA (6.9%) and in 7/89 of PFA (7.9%) cases. The CMA detection rate in pregnancies with isolated CCA (2/57, 3.5%) or PFA (2/50, 4.0%) was lower than in nonisolated cases, including additional CNS and/or extra-CNS sonographic anomalies (CCA-5/45, 11.1%; PFA-5/39, 12.8%), but this was not statistically significant. However, the rate among pregnancies that had extra-CNS anomalies, with or without additional CNS involvement (CCA-5/24, 20.8%; PFA-5/29, 17.2%), was significantly higher compared to all other cases (p = 0.0075 for CCA; p = 0.035 for PFA). Risk of CMA with clinically significant results for all and nonisolated CCA or PFA pregnancies was higher compared to the background risk reported in the control cohort (p < 0.001), but was not significant for isolated cases.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CMA testing is beneficial for the genetic workup of pregnancies with CCA or PFA, and is probably most informative when additional extra-CNS anomalies are observed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. . Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:610–620. - PubMed
    1. Novelli A, Grati FR, Ballarati L, et al. . Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:384–388. - PubMed
    1. Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. . Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2175–2184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Committee on Genetics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Committee Opinion No. 682: microarrays and next-generation sequencing technology: the use of advanced genetic diagnostic tools in Obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e262–e268. - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Committee on Genetics, and Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice bulletin no. 162: prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:e108–e122. - PubMed