Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnancies With Corpus Callosum or Posterior Fossa Anomalies
- PMID: 34079909
- PMCID: PMC8163489
- DOI: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000585
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnancies With Corpus Callosum or Posterior Fossa Anomalies
Abstract
Objective: We investigated the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results in pregnancies with sonographic diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum anomalies (CCA) or posterior fossa anomalies (PFA).
Methods: All CMA tests in pregnancies with CCA or PFA performed between January 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively evaluated from the Israeli Ministry of Health database. The rate of CMA with clinically significant (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) findings was calculated and compared to a local Israeli cohort of 5,541 pregnancies with normal ultrasound.
Results: One hundred eighty-two pregnancies were enrolled: 102 cases with CCA and 89 with PFA (9 cases had both). Clinically significant CMA results were found in 7/102 of CCA (6.9%) and in 7/89 of PFA (7.9%) cases. The CMA detection rate in pregnancies with isolated CCA (2/57, 3.5%) or PFA (2/50, 4.0%) was lower than in nonisolated cases, including additional CNS and/or extra-CNS sonographic anomalies (CCA-5/45, 11.1%; PFA-5/39, 12.8%), but this was not statistically significant. However, the rate among pregnancies that had extra-CNS anomalies, with or without additional CNS involvement (CCA-5/24, 20.8%; PFA-5/29, 17.2%), was significantly higher compared to all other cases (p = 0.0075 for CCA; p = 0.035 for PFA). Risk of CMA with clinically significant results for all and nonisolated CCA or PFA pregnancies was higher compared to the background risk reported in the control cohort (p < 0.001), but was not significant for isolated cases.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CMA testing is beneficial for the genetic workup of pregnancies with CCA or PFA, and is probably most informative when additional extra-CNS anomalies are observed.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
Similar articles
-
Prenatal clubfoot increases the risk for clinically significant chromosomal microarray results - Analysis of 269 singleton pregnancies.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Jun;145:105047. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105047. Epub 2020 Apr 20. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 32339917
-
[Prenatal genetic diagnosis of the fetuses with isolated corpus callosum abnormality].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 25;57(9):671-677. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220428-00281. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 36177578 Chinese.
-
[Value of chromosomal microarray analysis for the diagnosis of fetuses with anomalies of central nervous system].Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 10;40(2):181-185. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511381-20211231-01027. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2023. PMID: 36709937 Chinese.
-
What have we learned from 691 prenatal chromosomal microarrays for ventricular septal defects?Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):757-764. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13708. Epub 2019 Sep 9. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020. PMID: 31424084
-
Non-visualization of fetal gallbladder in microarray era - a retrospective cohort study and review of the literature.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Aug;32(16):2643-2648. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1443070. Epub 2018 Feb 28. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019. PMID: 29455582 Review.
Cited by
-
Characteristic Fetal Brain MRI Abnormalities in Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Deficiency.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Apr 10:2024.04.08.24303574. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.08.24303574. medRxiv. 2024. Update in: Neurology. 2024 Aug 27;103(4):e209728. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209728. PMID: 38645225 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Aug 15;17:3531-3540. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S472906. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 39161407 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal Corpus Callosum Anomalies: A Review of Underlying Genetic Disorders and Prenatal Testing Options.J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Apr;44(4):637-652. doi: 10.1002/jum.16639. Epub 2025 Jan 20. J Ultrasound Med. 2025. PMID: 39831641 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Structural brain abnormalities in Pallister-Killian syndrome: a neuroimaging study of 31 children.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Mar 8;19(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03065-5. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024. PMID: 38459574 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anomalies of the Corpus Callosum in Prenatal Ultrasound: A Narrative Review for Diagnosis and Further Counseling.J Med Ultrasound. 2023 Nov 10;32(2):99-103. doi: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_49_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun. J Med Ultrasound. 2023. PMID: 38882617 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. . Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:610–620. - PubMed
-
- Novelli A, Grati FR, Ballarati L, et al. . Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:384–388. - PubMed
-
- Committee on Genetics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Committee Opinion No. 682: microarrays and next-generation sequencing technology: the use of advanced genetic diagnostic tools in Obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e262–e268. - PubMed
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Committee on Genetics, and Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice bulletin no. 162: prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:e108–e122. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources