Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Dec 1;190(12):2658-2661.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab142.

Invited Commentary: The Promise and Pitfalls of Causal Inference With Multivariate Environmental Exposures

Comment

Invited Commentary: The Promise and Pitfalls of Causal Inference With Multivariate Environmental Exposures

Corwin M Zigler. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

The accompanying article by Keil et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(12):2647-2657) deploys Bayesian g-computation to investigate the causal effect of 6 airborne metal exposures linked to power-plant emissions on birth weight. In so doing, it articulates the potential value of framing the analysis of environmental mixtures as an explicit contrast between exposure distributions that might arise in response to a well-defined intervention-here, the decommissioning of coal plants. Framing the mixture analysis as that of an approximate "target trial" is an important approach that deserves incorporation into the already rich literature on the analysis of environmental mixtures. However, its deployment in the power plant example highlights challenges that can arise when the target trial is at odds with the exposure distribution observed in the data, a discordance that seems particularly difficult in studies of environmental mixtures. Bayesian methodology such as model averaging and informative priors can help, but they are ultimately limited for overcoming this salient challenge.

Keywords: Bayesian inference; causal inference; environmental mixtures; power plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rubin DB. For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. Ann Appl Stat. 2008;2(3):808–840.
    1. Hernán MA, Alonso A, Logan R, et al. Observational studies analyzed like randomized experiments: an application to postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart disease. Epidemiology. 2008;19(6):766–779. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keil AP, Buckley JP, Kalkbrenner AE. Bayesian g-computation for estimating impacts of interventions on exposure mixtures: demonstration with metals from coal-fired power plants and birth weight. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(12):2647–2657. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zigler CM, Dominici F. Point: clarifying policy evidence with potential-outcomes thinking—beyond exposure-response estimation in air pollution epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(12):1133–1140. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dominici F, Greenstone M, Sunstein CR. Particulate matter matters. Science. 2014;344(6181):257–259. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types