Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;48(3):295-305.
doi: 10.1177/10901981211010086.

Race-Based Sexual Stereotypes, Gendered Racism, and Sexual Decision Making Among Young Black Cisgender Women

Affiliations

Race-Based Sexual Stereotypes, Gendered Racism, and Sexual Decision Making Among Young Black Cisgender Women

Keosha T Bond et al. Health Educ Behav. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background. Due to their intersecting racial identity and gender identity, Black women are characterized by stigmatizing race-based sexual stereotypes (RBSS) that may contribute to persistent, disproportionately high rates of adverse sexual and reproductive health outcomes. RBSS are sociocognitive structures that shape Black women's social behavior including their sexual scripts. Objective. The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of RBSS on the sexual decision making of young Black women (YBW). Methods. We conducted four focus groups with 26 YBW between the ages of 18 and 25, living in a New York City neighborhood with a high HIV prevalence. Qualitative analysis was used to identify emergent themes within the domains of sexual decision making as it relates to safer sex practices and partner selection. Results. Thematic analyses revealed that RBSS may cause women to adopt more traditional gender stereotypes and less likely to feel empowered in the sexual decision making. Participants reported that RBSS may lead Black women to being resistant to learning new information about safer sex practices, feeling less empowered within intimate relationships, and jeopardizing their sexual well-being to affirm themselves in other social areas encouraging unprotected sex and relationships with men who have multiple sex partners. Discussion and Conclusion. Future research should focus on understanding the social and cultural factors that influence Black women's power in maintaining and improving their sexual health, including the aforementioned stereotypes that have influenced how others may view them as well as how they view themselves.

Keywords: African American; gender; qualitative methods; sexual behavior; women’s health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A conceptual model of intersectional sexual scripts relate to HIV vulnerability.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams JA, Tabaac A, Jung S, & Else-Quest NM (2020). Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research. Social Science & Medicine, 258, 113138. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amutah-Onukagha N, Mahadevan M, Opara I, Rodriguez M, Trusdell M, & Kelly J (2018). Project THANKS: Examining HIV/AIDS-related barriers and facilitators to care in African American women: A community perspective. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 32(4), 119–128. 10.1089/apc.2017.0215 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amutah-Onukagha NN, Opara I, Hammonds R, & Guthrie B (2018). Missed opportunities for HIV prevention: Results of a qualitative study on mother-daughter communication. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 17(4), 384–401. 10.1080/15381501.2018.1502708 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amutah NN (2012). African American women: The face of HIV/AIDS in Washington, DC. Qualitative Report, 17, 92.
    1. Ashmore RD, & Del Boca FK (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive–social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5(2), 219–248. 10.1007/BF00287932 - DOI

Publication types