Risk of Immune-related Adverse Events in Melanoma Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Disease Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Population-based Study Using SEER-Medicare Data
- PMID: 34081033
- DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000840
Risk of Immune-related Adverse Events in Melanoma Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Disease Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Population-based Study Using SEER-Medicare Data
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with a preexisting autoimmune disease (pAID) presenting with a cutaneous melanoma receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.
Methods: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries and linked Medicare claims between January 2010 and December 2015 was used to identify patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma who had pAID or received ICI or both. Patients were then stratified into 3 groups: ICI+pAID, non-ICI+pAID, and ICI+non-pAID. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to assess the risk of cardiac, pulmonary, endocrine, and neurological irAE.
Results: In total, 3704 individuals were included in the analysis. The majority of patients consisted of non-ICI+pAID patients (N=2706/73.1%), while 106 (2.9%) patients and 892 (24.1%) were classified as ICI+pAID and ICI+non-pAID, respectively. The risk of irAE was higher in the ICI+pAID group compared with the non-ICI+pAID and ICI+non-pAID, respectively (non-ICI: cardiac: hazard ratio [HR]=3.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.83-4.55; pulmonary: HR=3.94, 95% CI: 3.23-4.81; endocrine: HR=1.72, 95% CI: 1.53-1.93; neurological: HR=3.88, 95% CI: 2.30-6.57/non-pAID: cardiac: HR=3.83, 95% CI: 3.39-4.32; pulmonary: HR=2.08, 95% CI: 1.87-2.32; endocrine: HR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.14-1.32; neurological: HR=3.77, 95% CI: 2.75-5.18).
Conclusions: Patients with a pAID face a significantly higher risk of irAEs. Further research examining the clinical impact of these events on the patients' oncological outcome and quality of life is urgently needed given our findings of significantly worse rates of adverse events.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Q.-D.T. is supported by the Genentech Bio-Oncology Career Development Award from the Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, a Health Services Research pilot test grant from the Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, the Clay Hamlin Young Investigator Award from the Prostate Cancer Foundation. He reports personal fees from Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Insightec, and Intuitive Surgical. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Surveillance, Epidemilogy and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin; 2019. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html . Accessed January 14, 2019.
-
- Garbe C, Eigentler TK, Keilholz U, et al. Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects. Oncologist. 2011;16:5–24.
-
- Agarwala SS. Current systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009;9:587–595.
-
- Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–723.
-
- Maio M, Grob JJ, Aamdal S, et al. Five-year survival rates for treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab plus dacarbazine in a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1191–1196.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical