Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 23;4(3):e24791.
doi: 10.2196/24791.

A Global Overview of COVID-19 Research in the Pediatric Field: Bibliometric Review

Alice Monzani  1 , Francesco Tagliaferri  1 , Simonetta Bellone  1 , Giulia Genoni  2 , Ivana Rabbone  1
Affiliations
Review

A Global Overview of COVID-19 Research in the Pediatric Field: Bibliometric Review

Alice Monzani et al. JMIR Pediatr Parent. .

Abstract

Background: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, a great number of papers have been published in the pediatric field.

Objective: We aimed to assess research around the globe on COVID-19 in the pediatric field by bibliometric analysis, identifying publication trends and topic dissemination and showing the relevance of publishing authors, institutions, and countries.

Methods: The Scopus database was comprehensively searched for all indexed documents published between January 1, 2020, and June 11, 2020, dealing with COVID-19 in the pediatric population (0-18 years). A machine learning bibliometric methodology was applied to evaluate the total number of papers and citations, journal and publication types, the top productive institutions and countries and their scientific collaboration, and core keywords.

Results: A total of 2301 papers were retrieved, with an average of 4.8 citations per article. Of this, 1078 (46.9%) were research articles, 436 (18.9%) were reviews, 363 (15.8%) were letters, 186 (8.1%) were editorials, 7 (0.3%) were conference papers, and 231 (10%) were categorized as others. The studies were published in 969 different journals, headed by The Lancet. The retrieved papers were published by a total of 12,657 authors from 114 countries. The most productive countries were the United States, China, and Italy. The four main clusters of keywords were pathogenesis and clinical characteristics (keyword occurrences: n=2240), public health issues (n=352), mental health (n=82), and therapeutic aspects (n=70).

Conclusions: In the pediatric field, a large number of articles were published within a limited period on COVID-19, testifying to the rush to spread new findings on the topic in a timely manner. The leading authors, countries, and institutions evidently belonged to the most impacted geographical areas. A focus on the pediatric population was often included in general articles, and pediatric research about COVID-19 mainly focused on the clinical features, public health issues, and psychological impact of the disease.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; bibliometric review; children; literature; pediatrics; publications; research; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Collaboration map between countries in publications on COVID-19 in the pediatric population.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. WHO Health Emergency Dashboard. [2020-09-15]. https://extranet.who.int/publicemergency.
    1. De Luca Carmen Dolores, Esposito E, Cristiani L, Mancino E, Nenna R, Cortis E, Midulla F. Covid-19 in children: A brief overview after three months experience. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Sep;35:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.05.006. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32593648 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cristiani L, Mancino E, Matera L, Nenna R, Pierangeli A, Scagnolari C, Midulla F. Will children reveal their secret? The coronavirus dilemma. Eur Respir J. 2020 Apr 02;55(4):2000749. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00749-2020. http://erj.ersjournals.com:4040/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=32241833 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellegaard O, Wallin J. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015;105(3):1809–1831. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26594073 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 2017 Nov;11(4):959–975. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007. - DOI