Life-Sustaining Treatment States in Korean Cancer Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life
- PMID: 34082495
- PMCID: PMC8524027
- DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.325
Life-Sustaining Treatment States in Korean Cancer Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life
Abstract
Purpose: In Korea, the "Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life" was enacted on February 4, 2018. This study was conducted to analyze the current state of life-sustaining treatment decisions based on National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data after the law came into force.
Materials and methods: The data of 173,028 cancer deaths were extracted from NHIS qualification data between November 2015 and January 2019.
Results: The number of cancer deaths complied with the law process was 14,438 of 54,635 cases (26.4%). The rate of patient self-determination was 49.0%. The patients complying with the law process have used a hospice center more frequently (28% vs. 14%). However, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the patients who complied with and without the law process (ICU admission, 23% vs. 21%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis in the comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the law and the analysis according to the compliance with the law. The patients who complied with the law process received cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a lower rate.
Conclusion: The law has positive effects on the rate of life-sustaining treatment decision by patient's determination. However, there was no sufficient effect on the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, which could protect the patient from unnecessary or harmful interventions.
Keywords: Cancer deaths; Life-sustaining treatment; Life-sustaining treatment decisions law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.
Similar articles
-
The Situation of Life-Sustaining Treatment One Year after Enforcement of the Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life in Korea: Data of National Agency for Management of Life-Sustaining Treatment.Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;53(4):897-907. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.327. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Cancer Res Treat. 2021. PMID: 34082496 Free PMC article.
-
Current Status and Cardinal Features of Patient Autonomy after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act in Korea.Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;53(4):917-925. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.324. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Cancer Res Treat. 2021. PMID: 34082494 Free PMC article.
-
Implication of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on End-of-Life Care for Korean Terminal Patients.Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):917-924. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.740. Epub 2020 Mar 23. Cancer Res Treat. 2020. PMID: 32204581 Free PMC article.
-
Unilateral withholding and withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatment: a violation of dignity under the law in Canada.J Palliat Care. 2004 Autumn;20(3):143-9. J Palliat Care. 2004. PMID: 15511032 Review.
-
The effect of statutory limitations on the authority of substitute decision makers on the care of patients in the intensive care unit: case examples and review of state laws affecting withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment.J Intensive Care Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):71-80. doi: 10.1177/0885066611433551. Epub 2012 Jan 17. J Intensive Care Med. 2014. PMID: 22257784 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Withdrawing or Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Nationwide Case-Control Study Based on Medical Cost Analysis.J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Feb 19;39(6):e73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e73. J Korean Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38374632 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of withholding and withdrawal life-sustaining treatment issues on patients with sepsis: a prospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort study.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98584-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40307316 Free PMC article.
-
The Law Changes Behaviors: Is It Just Enough?Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;53(4):895-896. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.1025. Epub 2021 Sep 23. Cancer Res Treat. 2021. PMID: 34583459 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Characteristics of Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: National Data Analysis in South Korea.Asian Bioeth Rev. 2023 Nov 11;16(1):33-46. doi: 10.1007/s41649-023-00266-1. eCollection 2024 Jan. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2023. PMID: 38213986 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Affecting Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions and Changes in Clinical Practice after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) Decision Act: A Tertiary Hospital Experience in Korea.Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan;57(1):280-288. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.360. Epub 2024 Jul 1. Cancer Res Treat. 2025. PMID: 38965926 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Miljkovic MD, Jones BL, Miller K. From the Euthanasia Society to physician orders for life-sustaining treatment: end-of-life care in the United States. Cancer J. 2013;19:438–43. - PubMed
-
- Choi K. Legal and ethical issues regarding end-of-life care in Korea. J Asian Sociol. 2016;45:151–64.
-
- Kim M. The problems and the improvement plan of the Hospice/Palliative Care and Dying Patient’s Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment Act. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018;21:1–8.
-
- Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life [Internet] Sejong: Korea Ministry of Government Legislation; 2016. [cited 2021 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/eng/engLsSc.do?menuId=2§ion=lawNm&query=Li....
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical